Cops Run-Over and Kill a 17-year-old (and also a 21-year-old)



Video to submit? https://forms.gle/HmwnDQKvwvYPxe967
Blog: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/
Donate to the Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/support/give-now/thecivilrightslawyer/
For business inquiries: civilrightslawyer@ellify.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/johnbryanesq
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JohnBryanLaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/johnbryanesq/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

NOTE: We don’t condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system.

NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.

source

39 thoughts on “Cops Run-Over and Kill a 17-year-old (and also a 21-year-old)”

  1. Anybody that's running away should not be met with violence we're not allowed to shoot anybody when running away after a crime or anything so what makes cops any different

  2. Okay…..let's say that the cop doesn't run down the escaping 17 year old , proposing to catch him at some time in the future. Who's to say the suspect won't continue his reign of mayhem? He's already shown blatant disregard for public safety by crashing thru traffic and driving at 120 mph thru traffic, putting the public at risk of death or GBH.

    Is his accidental death any different than if he would have TC'd during the chase and died as a result of the crash?

    The mistake is on the part of the DA (?) not filing charges and allowing the jury to decide

  3. "…when the vehicle detective sergeant Key was driving turned and struck Mr Sterling" Oh, you mean when Sergeant Keeley made the decision to run the kid over, why not just say that? Why pretend the vehicle has any autonomy?

  4. We are living in a crime ridden society thanks to Brandon, and it's getting worse. We expect our police to get criminals off the street and protect life and property, but we also want accountability when it is necessary. I still think G. Fl0yd case was a travesty of justice against our men in blue.

  5. "Wanted for violent felony" Mr Sterling seems to be a outstanding citizen. Riley Doggett was a car thief, who bailed and ran. You all are a bunch of cop haters. Here is a brilliant idea, don't do crime and this won't happen to you. But if you play stupid games you win stupid prizes.

  6. The only difference i see is one was on a sidewalk and one was in a parking lot. I think BOTH should be charged but it would be easy to say He missjudged distance in a parking lot, Hard to say that ON a sidewalk into a building.

  7. Not that it matters, but the fire guys sure were in a hurry to help, weren't they? That's exactly why I stopped calling so-called "first responders." They aren't first, you are. Unless you can't, they are of little help to actually save your life. The second people to get there want everyone to hurry up and move, pull over and stop for them, yet when they get to the scene, molasses moves faster. No point in breaking all laws when you have no sense of hurrying up. The police sure hurry to get a criminal, but still take their time when it's to render aid.

  8. He drove straight at him if he was going to cut him off you would of drove to the left of him then turned in front of him… what a load of b.s

  9. I think most cops are POS but in the first case it isn’t clear that the cop meant to run over the suspect. The criminal brought it on himself by fleeing and endangering the lives of innocent people. He created the situation, like George Floyd, that led to his death.

  10. FBI Website shows law enforcement killing 3+ Citizens per day in 2020's while on average 3+ officers killed by nefarious means per month….
    Job safety statistics prove it's more dangerous to be a School crossing guard then a cop….
    I'm tired of hearing about "officers safety " I want to start hearing "citizens safety " because we are way WAY More likely to be killed by Law enforcement.
    Freedom is scary… deal with it of get a different job.

  11. The second officer should be charged with murder also the officer knew exactly what he was doing I don't think he intended to kill the runner but he did intend to stop him with his vehicle and took it too far!!!!!!

  12. Short strokes are that some police departments (and their enabling prosecuting attorneys) feel that someone suspected of a crime (and let’s be honest, this guy was suspected because he committed a crime) loses their constitutional rights. Once they start their “investigation,” whether it’s because they got a call, or they see something they think is suspicious, or because a person annoys them, or when they feel “unsafe,” or even when the legitimately think someone may have committed a crime, they unilaterally suspend your constitutional rights until they hand you off to the jail. Any crime the police commit between those two events are typically ignored and there is no way to redress your grievances.

  13. Sadly in Grand Rapids we have a Prosecuting Attorney with a history of choosing not to prosecute cops involved in killing civilians. He's the same PA who couldn't find reason to prosecute a cop , who while wrestling with a defendant, shot the guy in head, killing him. The guy was being pulled over for a bad license tag. While he had other issues, the cop didn't know it when he blew his brains out. Clearly, it's not just the cops we need to worry about.

  14. What’s with the different treatment between these two cases? when a black person dies at the hands of police, there is mass outrage. But when it happens to a white person? No.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top