Corruption at it's best….no justice in America….thanks to people like her…how do they sleep at night… because they are evil…. maybe karma , just maybe, pure evil … unreal…
If you were a available scholar then you would know you aren’t getting a traffic ticket to federal court. Get a job buddy and quit making your family embarrassed.
Seems to me that the courts should be charged under the R.I.C.O. Act when they pull crap like this. That judge was nothing short of a gangster thug intent on completely robbing you of your right to defend yourself. That's definitely a racketeering act if I've ever seen one.
Is there anything you don't repeat twice or lie about? The judge clearly told you that you could not video record. You did it anyway and now you are lying about it. The video is being shown by other YouTubers you are a liar period
The system is Corrupt it's so sad. From the beginning of the video, the signage is a main part of the case common sense. We all need a whole new change in the system to government law enforcement judges care facilities hospitals doctors reception honest people who stand up for the constitutio, they swore to uphold to respect the right of those who work So hot taxpayers and get treated like animals But it may be a joke to them but one day we all have to stand before the righteous church and he’s not a prospective person that’s God Almighty and it won’t be a joke then
Whom ever that lady is… God have mercy on her soul. They do a disservice to this country. They are lower than criminals. They should be underneath the prisons. Worse than Animals.
Right on. Government at every level has morfed into an extortionist police state. Emergency war powers is reality. Legitimate representative government is gone and is just a pretext to keep the people in the blind.
the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that televising trials does not, per se, violate due process. Although the U.S. Constitution contains a public trial clause, it has been argued that the requirement of a public trial was created and satisfied when there were no broadcasters or telecasters and few newspapers.
They have online court hearings … Zoom or whatever they're called. They have security cameras in every court. They record audio in every court. Why should it be a big deal if someone else records something? As long as it isn't creating a disruption, shouldn't matter.
Trial by jury so you CAN let the JURY know THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW AND EXTORTING MONEY FROM THE PEOPLE. by issuing tickets writs of atainder… and let them know about the mony grab from the BAR..BY THE BAR HAVING ITS HAND IN ALL ARE LEGISLATION ..IT IS TREASONOUS TO THINK I CAN BE A PROFESSOR OF LAW AND TEACH LAW BUT IN ORDER TO.. (Practice )..LAW INEED TO BE A B.A.R. MEMBER, AND MY MORALES HAVE. TO aline with there's even if I pass there bull shet test they still can deny me purely. because they don't like you or your way of thinking…who made them god ..some lawyers are better. than others…….people will always go for the best they can afford……THEY DONT WANT PEOPLE CHALLENGING THEIR WAYS….THATS COMING TO AN END REAL SOON …
You can beet these ass hats with there own rules of criminal and civil court ,,,,civil is for suits of equity ,, ( who is suing you)(and for what . )…criminal it has to have a victim a injury to someoneor there property you have the right to face your victim…and alwaystrial by jury … ……(the government can't be the victim..) expect for property damage..but not in a personal aspect…
Defended myself in court. Prepared thoroughly. Shutdown by a tyrant judge, thrown out another time. Good experience though, but there is nothing they won't do to you.
Fuck you. You're a lot of talk and no content. You piece of shit. You're a scammer and a fraud. Again, FUCK YOU, you internet scab. Anyone that gives you money is a moron. You're no different than religious scammers. FUCK OFF. You pussy. The signage IS there.
All of this was found on a Lakeway,TX website about Representing Yourself in Municipal Court. The Judge should have explained these rules to ANY person representing themselves. This is NOT common knowledge. I think you should ask for a new trial or an appeal. I am not an attorney. You are very knowledgeable. If you didn't know all of this then how would any normal person know?? You were not treated fairly in my opinion.
Request for the Making of an Electronic Record (recording) All requests for a trial to be electronically recorded, in order to provide a record for appeal, must be made to the Judge in writing at or before the pre-trial hearing. Failure to do so waives a defendant’s right to have the proceedings (trial) recorded.
Presenting the Case As in all criminal trials, the State will present its case first by calling witnesses to testify against you. You will have the right to cross-examine each prosecution witness. In other words, you can ask the witness questions about their testimony. However, you cannot argue with the witness. Your cross-examination of the witness must be in the form of questions only. Do not attempt to tell your version of the incident at this time – you will have an opportunity to do so later if you testify.
After the State has presented its case, you may present your case. You have the right to call any witness who knows anything about the incident, but the witnesses can testify only about matters of which they have personal knowledge.
If you choose, you may testify in your own behalf. Since you are the defendant, you cannot be compelled to testify. It is your choice, you may do as you wish, and your silence cannot be used against you.
The State also has the right to cross-examine all witnesses called by you. If you testify in your own behalf, the State may cross-examine.
After testimony is concluded by both sides, you can make a closing argument by telling the Court why you feel that you are not guilty of the offense charged. But such statement can only be based on the testimony heard during the trial. Additional testimony is not admissible in the closing argument.
These laws may be found in Chapter 45 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. (Should be similar in Arizona)
You have the right to inspect the complaint before trial and have it read to you at the trial itself
You are entitled to hear all testimony introduced against you
You have a right to cross-examine any witness who testifies against you
You have the right to testify in your own behalf. You also have the right not to testify. If you choose not to testify, your refusal cannot be considered in determining your innocence or guilt of the charge.
You may call witnesses to testify in your behalf at the trial, and have the right to have the Court issue subpoenas to these witnesses to ensure their appearance at the trial
Shame on that so-called judge! Her pig ass ain't a real judge anyway as she ain't a Article 3 judge!
Corruption at it's best….no justice in America….thanks to people like her…how do they sleep at night… because they are evil…. maybe karma , just maybe, pure evil … unreal…
Wait so you know more than a judge
If you were a available scholar then you would know you aren’t getting a traffic ticket to federal court. Get a job buddy and quit making your family embarrassed.
What are you going to but get on here and whine?
Seems to me that the courts should be charged under the R.I.C.O. Act when they pull crap like this. That judge was nothing short of a gangster thug intent on completely robbing you of your right to defend yourself. That's definitely a racketeering act if I've ever seen one.
Is there anything you don't repeat twice or lie about? The judge clearly told you that you could not video record. You did it anyway and now you are lying about it. The video is being shown by other YouTubers you are a liar period
Anyone with the average intelligence, can see the TRUTH.
That was totally WRONG ; what that DISHONORABLY JUDGE PRACTICED. .
That was UNBELIEVABLE.. totally BIAS
Donate to Chili on his web site.
People when you donate money on you tube they charge higher fees
Direct D told the judge to kick rocks because he would appeal it all to a non kangaroo court
Only a fool can make them selves look like a fool the way judges, lawyers and cops
Oh I forgot, most judges are criminals
​@Delete Lawz What happened to this? Did you appeal it? It would make a good followup video.
The system is Corrupt it's so sad. From the beginning of the video, the signage is a main part of the case common sense. We all need a whole new change in the system to government law enforcement judges care facilities hospitals doctors reception honest people who stand up for the constitutio, they swore to uphold to respect the right of those who work So hot taxpayers and get treated like animals But it may be a joke to them but one day we all have to stand before the righteous church and he’s not a prospective person that’s God Almighty and it won’t be a joke then
And the $500 fine will turn into a warrant for your arrest if you fail to pay it, that judge is a criminal!!
Chille for Arizona Governor!!!
The courts in the us suck!!!
Whom ever that lady is… God have mercy on her soul. They do a disservice to this country. They are lower than criminals. They should be underneath the prisons. Worse than Animals.
That judge is a joke
This is why we use a camera truck, so we can collect tons of videos, they can't dismiss 6 day's of back to back video
I always do trial by jury. Judges are waaaaaay toooooooo biased.
Always been like that.
20 years ago I had a judge walk all over me. Absolutely nothing I do or say.
Right on. Government at every level has morfed into an extortionist police state. Emergency war powers is reality. Legitimate representative government is gone and is just a pretext to keep the people in the blind.
I was watching the hearing video and my wife, who's not political at all, says "That judge sounds terrible."
I think you looked like a complete dipshit in court. Ha, good luck with an appeal.
the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that televising trials does not, per se, violate due process. Although the U.S. Constitution contains a public trial clause, it has been argued that the requirement of a public trial was created and satisfied when there were no broadcasters or telecasters and few newspapers.
They televised court proceedings on tv, whats wrong what you did.
They have online court hearings … Zoom or whatever they're called. They have security cameras in every court. They record audio in every court. Why should it be a big deal if someone else records something? As long as it isn't creating a disruption, shouldn't matter.
Trial by jury so you CAN let the JURY know THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW AND EXTORTING MONEY FROM THE PEOPLE. by issuing tickets writs of atainder… and let them know about the mony grab from the BAR..BY THE BAR HAVING ITS HAND IN ALL ARE LEGISLATION ..IT IS TREASONOUS TO THINK I CAN BE A PROFESSOR OF LAW AND TEACH LAW BUT IN ORDER TO.. (Practice )..LAW INEED TO BE A B.A.R. MEMBER, AND MY MORALES HAVE. TO aline with there's even if I pass there bull shet test they still can deny me purely. because they don't like you or your way of thinking…who made them god ..some lawyers are better. than others…….people will always go for the best they can afford……THEY DONT WANT PEOPLE CHALLENGING THEIR WAYS….THATS COMING TO AN END REAL SOON …
You can beet these ass hats with there own rules of criminal and civil court ,,,,civil is for suits of equity ,, ( who is suing you)(and for what . )…criminal it has to have a victim a injury to someoneor there property you have the right to face your victim…and alwaystrial by jury … ……(the government can't be the victim..) expect for property damage..but not in a personal aspect…
Maricopa is a pit. Snatching liberty of voters for decades and supressing due process.
Who pays the court salaries?? Government. Sooooo who will they judge in favor of.
Defended myself in court. Prepared thoroughly. Shutdown by a tyrant judge, thrown out another time. Good experience though, but there is nothing they won't do to you.
cant u put in a complaint in with the judges internal affairs or oversight?
POST YOUR EVIDENCE PLEASE I WOULD LOVE TO WATCH WHAT THE so called judge wouldn't show us
Fuck you. You're a lot of talk and no content. You piece of shit. You're a scammer and a fraud. Again, FUCK YOU, you internet scab. Anyone that gives you money is a moron. You're no different than religious scammers. FUCK OFF. You pussy. The signage IS there.
All of this was found on a Lakeway,TX website about Representing Yourself in Municipal Court. The Judge should have explained these rules to ANY person representing themselves. This is NOT common knowledge. I think you should ask for a new trial or an appeal. I am not an attorney. You are very knowledgeable. If you didn't know all of this then how would any normal person know?? You were not treated fairly in my opinion.
Request for the Making of an Electronic Record (recording)
All requests for a trial to be electronically recorded, in order to provide a record for appeal, must be made to the Judge in writing at or before the pre-trial hearing. Failure to do so waives a defendant’s right to have the proceedings (trial) recorded.
Presenting the Case
As in all criminal trials, the State will present its case first by calling witnesses to testify against you. You will have the right to cross-examine each prosecution witness. In other words, you can ask the witness questions about their testimony. However, you cannot argue with the witness. Your cross-examination of the witness must be in the form of questions only. Do not attempt to tell your version of the incident at this time – you will have an opportunity to do so later if you testify.
After the State has presented its case, you may present your case. You have the right to call any witness who knows anything about the incident, but the witnesses can testify only about matters of which they have personal knowledge.
If you choose, you may testify in your own behalf. Since you are the defendant, you cannot be compelled to testify. It is your choice, you may do as you wish, and your silence cannot be used against you.
The State also has the right to cross-examine all witnesses called by you. If you testify in your own behalf, the State may cross-examine.
After testimony is concluded by both sides, you can make a closing argument by telling the Court why you feel that you are not guilty of the offense charged. But such statement can only be based on the testimony heard during the trial. Additional testimony is not admissible in the closing argument.
These laws may be found in Chapter 45 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. (Should be similar in Arizona)
You have the right to inspect the complaint before trial and have it read to you at the trial itself
You are entitled to hear all testimony introduced against you
You have a right to cross-examine any witness who testifies against you
You have the right to testify in your own behalf. You also have the right not to testify. If you choose not to testify, your refusal cannot be considered in determining your innocence or guilt of the charge.
You may call witnesses to testify in your behalf at the trial, and have the right to have the Court issue subpoenas to these witnesses to ensure their appearance at the trial
administrative hearing NOT COURT…diff rules for court like hearing…you by entering a plea are subjecting yourself to their terms…