Update! – Rookie Cop Can't Keep His Story Straight



Cranford Police: https://www.facebook.com/CranfordPD/
Previous Video: https://youtu.be/97hG-BgeuzQ
Nate does not have a YouTube channel.

Submit your video: https://forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6

MERCH: https://crowdmade.com/collections/lackluster
Body Cam: https://amzn.to/3KdeIi6
Gimbal: https://amzn.to/3gZCQsd
Best Camera: https://amzn.to/3x1gn3L
GoPro: https://amzn.to/2U8KY0M
Radar/Laser Detector $$$: https://amzn.to/37LtQC2
Radar/Laser Detector $$: https://amzn.to/3bGyZfQ
Radar/Laser Detector $: https://amzn.to/37hQIfg
DashCam $$$: https://amzn.to/3x6fKZC
DashCam $$: https://amzn.to/3MsqHLc
DashCam $: https://amzn.to/41N79XJ

– – Channels – –
The Odd Side: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw
Lady LackLuster: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w

– – Social – –
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lacklustermedia.official
DISCORD: https://discord.gg/SUcPuym
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DaleHillerYT
IG: lackluster_media
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lackluster_official

This page contains affiliate links. I receive commissions on verified purchases at no cost to you.

Did you know that Law Enforcement Agencies and Public Officials can’t block your criticism on social media? If you chose to comment on a public forum such as Twitter or Facebook, they can’t delete comments they don’t agree with. Want to learn more? https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/court-rules-public-officials-cant-block-critics-facebook

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

Disclaimer: Our videos should not be considered a “call to action.” We are not attorneys. Our videos should not be construed as legal advice. If you require legal assistance, contact a lawyer in your jurisdiction for help. The facts presented in our publications do not reflect the opinions of any employer or organization in which we participate. Laws, case law, ordinances, policies, legal doctrine, and all other jurisprudence is subject to the interpretation of the court. The videos shown are designed to be educational and informative, based on the information available at the time the video was published. All claims made are alleged.

If you see a mistake or misrepresentation, email us to let us know how we can remedy the issue.

Lack@LackLusterVideo.com

For business inquiries: LackLuster@AMG.GG

#LackLuster #Cops #Police

source

46 thoughts on “Update! – Rookie Cop Can't Keep His Story Straight”

  1. Cranford Police: https://www.facebook.com/CranfordPD/

    Previous Video: https://youtu.be/97hG-BgeuzQ

    Nate does not have a YouTube channel.

    Submit your video: https://forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6

    MERCH: https://crowdmade.com/collections/lackluster

    Body Cam: https://amzn.to/3KdeIi6

    Gimbal: https://amzn.to/3gZCQsd

    Best Camera: https://amzn.to/3x1gn3L

    GoPro: https://amzn.to/2U8KY0M

    Radar/Laser Detector $$$: https://amzn.to/37LtQC2

    Radar/Laser Detector $$: https://amzn.to/3bGyZfQ

    Radar/Laser Detector $: https://amzn.to/37hQIfg

    DashCam $$$: https://amzn.to/3x6fKZC

    DashCam $$: https://amzn.to/3MsqHLc

    DashCam $: https://amzn.to/41N79XJ

    – – Channels – –

    The Odd Side: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw

    Lady LackLuster: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w

    – – Social – –

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lacklustermedia.official

    DISCORD: https://discord.gg/SUcPuym

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/DaleHillerYT

    IG: lackluster_media

    TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lackluster_official

    This page contains affiliate links. I receive commissions on verified purchases at no cost to you.

  2. Judge,you like many others are throwing your cards in with the police and that in this day and and age of cameras and citizens recording stops should make you think twice. Citizens are better informed and have a way of recording absolute proof and this should be noted by all law enforcement and judges

  3. I feel like the job of a judge should be overtaken by AI at some point, because people have too many biases, too many emotions too much irrationality. It's not the job of a judge to support one side, it's to be fair.

  4. Can the Judge be Amonished for failure to allow Critical Proof and Evidence to entered and submitted absolving Nate of a Infraction or crime?
    Can Nate file a Judiciary Complaint?
    He represented himself pro se and perhaps a lawyer would have been able to enter the Video?

  5. The dumb fuck literally said "I didn't know it was being recorded, you know everybody has the right to record…" but the only footage of the encounter comes from his camera, that he knowingly put on and activated, and the camera of the cop that showed up as backup.

  6. The judge was about to say, If you want to get an officers attention, flip him the bird, but then he stopped himself and said, have things hanging from your mirror. That makes no sense, since the judge ruled the officer didn't see the necklace until he got up to his car! So how did that necklace "get the officers attention"?? The judge KNOWS he was stopped for flipping off the cop! He's too crooked to be honest about the right to do that, WITHOUT RETALIATION!
    That judge just told that lying cop, he can get away with lying under oath,!! Great job!

  7. These are the morons police departments hire when you have equally stupid judges and prosecutors willing to ignore actual law when deciding a case. Cop's name should be Jailedman for the number of lies he pulled out of his bulbous behind.

  8. The problem here is that questioning the constitutionality of the stop probably needed to be done in a motion to dismiss filed before trial. There was no probably cause for the stop to begin with, and all the evidence was there to prove it, and that should have been heard before any trial was held.

  9. Afterwards the judge made up a possible violation and then the stop was legal? How stupid is the US legal system.
    Cop: "We raided the wrong house but fortunately we found half an ounce of weed. So the 50k$ damages to the house were justified…"

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top