Congratulations to West Virginia’s first Second Amendment “Sanctuary,” Putnam County, in obtaining a new anti-gun diatribe of a published opinion from the Fourth Circuit. This morning, the Fourth Circuit issued a published opinion in the Walker case. Basically, the Second Amendment doesn’t apply to the AR-15, and it matters not that the WV legislature allows its citizens to possess and use AR-15s, because the judiciary decides what peasants may possess – not the state legislature.
Freedom is Scary. Episode No. 66.
Read the opinion and watch the original video here: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/2021/07/07/fourth-circuit-issues-anti-ar15-diatribe-in-the-walker-case/
source
Pesky amendments make his job more difficult. What a dickhead. Having said that, in any country that allows people outside the armed forces to own an AR style gun, trampling on peoples rights are the least of your problems.
So, everyone that owns or displays an AR-15 or a black shirt and camo pants are already predetermined by the police to be detainable/guilty under those facts only.
Welcome to backwards land, everyone!
Assessing how many people a certain rifle can kill depends on the killer, not his gun. How About the guy that killed and injured all the people in Waukesha with his SUV??
This guy is a freakin idiot. Please explain judges why it is ok for this officer to completely overlook his rights and talk to him like he does. Obviously y’all are in the good ole boy club with him because there is no excuse for letting him get away with breaking the laws. Corruption at its best looks like to me!!!
These hacks who have been hired by this police agency are as stupid as the ones who hired them. Ego shouldn't be a part of Law Enforcement. Fire officer not friendly more like officer jerk off. 😅
I would like to see a few thousand people with AR 15's walk across Putnum county. (By the way Governor Brine has a ring to it:) .
Two tear standard for police not law Biden citizen
Are you suggesting that "camouflage" is stereotypical of "white men" as "baggy pants" is stereotypical of "black men"? If so, that sounds a bit racist to me.
Furthermore, had that been a "black man", do you feel the engagement would've been the same? Do you think the cops would have simply walked up to him and ask for ID? No. I doubt that. The civil rights violation could have far more advanced< in my opinion.
I watch many of your videos and I appreciate and agree with much of the things you're said and done in regards to civil rights. But, this notion that white men are being "targeted", is a flawed one.
Thanks again for what you do ! Hope you get the appeal and win as they are taking our rights little by little !
I hope the Supreme Court sees this for what it is if he had been wrongfully arrested they would’ve seen this different
For the last 40 years our country has exponentially gotten more and more afraid of everything just as anyone wants a docile group of scared to death slaves that just do as they’re told or threat of arrest regardless of how unreasonable they’re request is we as individuals need to reinforce our spines and expect the same from others this cowardice is insane
Looking at all the rulings" it just looks like this ruling is completely wrong through and through. I can't help but feel this would be overturned in a higher court.
Can or will this go to the Supreme Court for review?
Can the police compel you to identify when you're detained in West Virginia? I'm aware WV is not a stop and ID state, however, I have heard that law enforcement there routinely uses obstruction as a means to compel the detainee to identify when lawfully detained.
With that thought. If I was going hunting with an AR15 on my gun rack of my truck with my camo cloths on the police can pull me over and check my ID ? We keep loosing our rights.
This tyrant was appalling. I'm not surprised in any way that he wasn't reprimanded. The police have been out of control for quite some time because they very rarely face consequences for their wrongdoings. The verbal gymnastics in that courtroom to justify trampling someone's rights is down right disgusting behavior.
I wasn't aware that west Virginia had so many commie cops in the state, including the judiciary.
be nice to see you on rekieta
Keep up the good work. 👍
The way the Leo berates and cusses this citizen is outstandingly bad and shocking. Most employees serving the public would be severely disciplined, if not terminated, for such actions. This is without considering the Leo violating this citizens civil rights. Disgusting.
Putnam county.. when cop cowardice takes you to the supreme court.. I would be so proud….
An opinion is not law. 14:43
Are able to take this to the higher court?
'shall not be infringed,' free-take one, stop, do not steal, do unto others… I mean, how simple is infringement? You need to qualify federal judges who understand what NO means, what SIT means, what common sense, okay I went too far with that one.
It's important to note the type of firearm…..
BC it's a hot grenade launcher.
How can we tolerate LEO lying to initiate a detention? How do we guard our 4A in the face of a lie? WV judiciary is scary.
@15:50s That argument is idiotic. So if a study is done and we discover most terrorist use iphone cameras to survey public targets, does that mean taking pictures on an iphone in public is a reasonable cause for detention.
1. Is the officer now on notice, about IDing, so that should never happen again,2. On the camouflage issue, he said he was going hunting. Camouflage would be proper attire for the event, last but not least would the stop happen if he had a shot gun or rugger 10/22… 3 when you depo the officers, do they get schooled on stop and ID rules….
How does the second amendment not apply to the AR-15? At the time the Bill of Rights and Constitution were written, the second amendment applied to, in context, rifles. At that time, they would have anticipated and been aware of advancements in firearms technology. 1770 is when the Ferguson breech-loading rifles were designed and produced from 1776-1778. If they had access to those firearms they would have used them in the regular army and the militia.
Other weapons like the Kalthoff repeater, Cookson repeater, lorenzoni repeater, and many others. The Fafting rifle in Norway could achieve 18-20 shots per minute which dwarfed the typical 3-4 maybe 5 rounds per minute a musket or rifle could put downrange, in trained hands. There are examples of revolvers in the late 1500s and mid-1600s, long before they became ubiquitous. There is no way in my mind that the founders of the United States couldn't forsee repeating, semi-automatic, and automatic small arms coming into existence and the point of the second amendment is protection against tyranny.
"ID!
"No"
"bUt iT's An AR-15!"
"Nah bro It's H&K MR556"
"oh… um… carry on"
Have you asked for an en banc hearing?
I've been in that situation before. Nothing plus nothing equals something. Legal fictions are incompatible with justice.
Basically there saying that if your weapon is a) effective b) scary, then the constitution shouldn't apply.
It’s important to know where the judges came from. Judge King, is an Cl!ntonista, Judge Keenan is an Obam!te, and Judge Richardson was appointed by TRUMP!
Just goes to show that Trump made some questionable appointments as well. However, it’s clear the Cl!ntonista and the Obam!te drove the narrative of this decision.
I truly hope this case will receive a full en-banc hearing, and hopefully will make it to SCOTUS, where they can settle this idea that acting in a perfectly legal manner can be somehow construed to allow the intrusion of government on the rights of the individual.
YouTube is “auto-deleting” my comments, because I am making points about the “ant!-gum” attitude of the court.
Their ruling is riddled with lies and inaccuracies, regarding the “deadliest weapons”. Chicago has more deaths and injuries from handguns in any given weekend, than does the entire history of the AR-15.
Please FIGHT this case all the way. 👍
BASICALLY…YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS AND THE US CONSTITUTION MEANS NOTHING AND THE POLICE GESTAPO CAN OPERATE WITH IMPUNITY CRUSHING AN INDIVIDUALS RIGHTS AND THE STATE WILL ALWAYS SIDE WITH THE GESTAPO. KID IS LUCKY THE THUGS DIDN'T SHOOT HIM AND SAY HE PULLED THE WEAPON ON THEM…AND ERASE THE BODY CAM FOOTAGE
FOR THE "LAW ENFORCEMENT" 'OFFICER -(A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE STATE OR COUNTY SWORN TO UPHOLD AND ENFORCE THE LAWS OF THE STATE ETC) USING C-SUCKER, A-HOLE, F-BOMB, ETC WHEN SPEAKING TO A CITIZEN NOT CHARGED WITH A CRIME, NOT SUSPECTED OF A CRIME…. IS WHOLLY UNPROFESSIONAL AND THIS LOW-IQ THUG SHOULD HAVE BEEN TERMINATED FOR USING THIS TYPE OF LANGUAGE IN PUBLIC. HIS DEMEANOR IS ESCALATION OF TENSION, ANTAGONIZING THE CITIZEN, PROJECTING EVERY "OTHER ENCOUNTER" ON THIS INDIVIDUAL, THEN THREATENED CITIZEN WITH JAIL/INCARCERATION. …THIS COP SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIRED THAT DAY
Used this day and age argument to justify their argument
Hope this is being appealed. This is a violation of the 2nd, 4th, and a dozen other laws.
Our courts are broken. Look no further than a stolen election for proof.
We need a Karen law that instructs law enforcement to educate Karens on the phone when an activity is legal such as open carrying a firearm and to inform the Karens they will not be harassing citizens over them exercising their legal rights.
YOUR JOB DOES NOT INCLUDE BOTHERING PEOPLE FOR NO OTHER REASON THAT YOU CAN BE DISTRACTED BY SOME SHINY OBJECT
@CONTITUTIONAL LAWYER. THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE RIGHTS… THE GOVERNMENT HAS PROHIBITIONS INSTEAD
Judge made so many factual errors it's mind boggling, he's just parroting gun grabber talking points: 1. The AR-15 is not an assault rifle as assault rifles are select fire weapons capable of either burst or full auto modes. 2. The AR-15 is not high power, in fact it is so low power that many jurisdictions prevent hunting deer with them as the .223/5.56 cartridge isn't powerful enough to humanely kill deer. 3. The AR-15 is incredibly common. It is one of if not the most common rifles in the US specifically due to its low cost, cheap ammo, and parts availability. 4. Claiming the AR-15 is a more dangerous firearm because it was used in so many shootings is like saying the Ford F-150 is a more dangerous truck because it's in more collisions, when it's the most sold truck in the world.
…. ahhh… jessss….. Gun Free Zones…. the place where ONLY CRIMINALS have GUNS…. 👍🏼🤦🏻♂️
I listened to a constitutional scholar state that the types of firearms we have are protected if they are appropriate for the militia. Under 10 U.S. Code § 246 – Militia: composition and classes, the unorganized militia is identified, so is the organized militia. Both classes of militia are protected under 2A, aren't they?
So it's a defacto assault weapons ban in the 4th circuit district states imposed by the federal court? Just like in the 7th.