Get your “We Don’t Stop” T-shirt and your Indestructible Tri-Fold on DeletelawZ dot com — We Dont Stop —
THE TRANSPARENCY APP IS COMING VERY SOON!!
You should always use THE TRIFOLD That we sell on INDESTRUCTIBLE PAPER from the website DeleteLawZ dot com for $25.00. We ship it from Los Angeles. OR — get the Trifold you PRINT AT HOME for five dollars by Putting “FiveDollarTrifold” (When you go to Purchase the $15 Digital Download, that’s WHEN you put the ONE WORD, FiveDollarTrifold in and then you print it at home)
DeleteLawZ dot com
Thanks,
Chille
@ChilleDeCastro PayPal
@Chille-DeCastro Venmo
$ChilleDeCastro Cashapp
source
Dallas I am on vacation in Virginia 1
Oksss
29:33(approx)video signal lost,audio continues 32:19(approx)video feed restored.
Ironton Ohio Police corruption ➡️➡️➡️↙️↙️ youtu.be/vJrWZjYul5w
☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
Hanshaw and some pig goons caught on camera at the jail torturing a defenseless man in torture cuffs and tied down to a chair. Piss of bag pigs 🐷 🐷🐷🐷
Can we sue government agencies that defend crooked employers from the employees that file wage claims?
Please dont forget in Grants Pass Oregon and surrounding areas we have a serious problem. We need you to come teach here and this microchip is still here waiting to be removed.
If the states have been enforcing laws that are unconstitutional on their face, it would seem that there must be some way that a state can legally put restrictions — such as licensing requirements, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, vehicle inspections to name just a few — on a citizen's constitutionally protected rights. Is that so?
For the answer, let us look, once again, to the U.S. courts for a determination of this very issue. In Hertado v. California, 110 US 516, the U.S Supreme Court states very plainly:
"The state cannot diminish rights of the people."
And in Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60,
"Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void."
Would we not say that these judicial decisions are straight to the point — that there is no lawful method for government to put restrictions or limitations on rights belonging to the people? Other cases are even more straight forward:
"The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice." Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, at 24
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.
"The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller v. US, 230 F 486, at 489.
There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights." Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F 946
CASE #1: "The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.
CASE #2: "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.
It could not be stated more directly or conclusively that citizens of the states have a common law right to travel, without approval or restriction (license), and that this right is protected under the U.S Constitution.
CASE #3: "The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.
CASE #4: "The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right." Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.🤔
Meh No Treason The Constitution of No Authority
Watching from Kansas City
Thank you so so so much for revealing clarence thomas, that insane man!
Viewing from the UK. Keep up your very good work.
I think the legal explanation is intentionally vague because most citizen dont understand it enough to fight it and just give in.
So when the cute little walking man on the WALK signal turns into a red hand in the middle of the walk are we required to STOP ? When did we lose our ability to decide when to cross the street?
Keep Pressing!
Dungeon
Traveling is constitutional,driving a privilege
San Antonio Texas backs delete/lawz
Flint Michigan
I have been having a hard time watching you here in Oregon. Lags a lot and now I'm understanding why. Thank you Chille I'm learning. So much!
I Alway miss live?
The State Patrol, dept of Transportation, dept of Licensing, look around each year to find MORE ways to make more Revenue from citizens. These agencies send their new proposals to get increases in fines, and make more laws and regulations on citizens to the Legislators for adoption every year.
You know this shit is only going to get worse especially with the confirmation of Steven Breyer's replacement in SCOTUS, she is far more radical then Justice Breyer.
Love your enthusiasm… You becoming governor not happening…
T
Licencing is the tools of tyrants. Just like all the statutes, written as an alternative/replacement of the Public Laws, more importantly, the alternative/replacement was of the courts. These statutes appear very much like actual laws, but they are not, that is why they are called statutes. This was all completely lawful, although the authority of Congress to pass the Act of 1871, incorporating the United States, is seriously in doubt, but, providing the act effected only" government employees, and corporations" and not applied to the people. It was lawful. However, that was a short lived practice, and it wasn't long before the deceptive language of the newly formed"legal society" had the people convinced that the statutes and rules made strictly for the smooth operation of the new corporation, were being applied to the people. Of course, the common law courts were also getting harder and harder to find, and the growing nation had more need than ever for a place to settle disputes, they naturally gravitated to the courts most easily available to them, and, who was the government to say that the people entering these new courts, weren't corporations or government employees. And so it began, the growing corporation, the United States, made more and more rules for it's subjects, ( those actually under the dominion of the head corporation, employees and corporations) one of the new rules were for any "person", ( defined as corporation in the legal society's law dictionary, and the society's new"language") that wanted to use a motor vehicle on the public ways, must apply for a driver's license. So the deceptive legal language, that changed the meanings of words used every day, coupled with the federal governments (the corporation) bribing the states to incorporate under the Fed's in order to be eligible for funding for roads and all things that a corporation needs to regulate, of course, the heads of the individual states, one by one, fell in line to get the extra money the Fed's dangled before them. And that is how, to this very day, the government gets away with applying their rules, regulations, statutes, ECT to the people. By the intricate and we'll thought out plan, if the people applied for it, they must be corporations…….. It's All so dasterdly, evil, criminal, in it's omission of facts, it's silence about who the codes actually applied to, and so cleverly executed, how can the people be blamed, when all they really wanted was to remain in good standing with the law, upright citizens of the united states', the republic.
Ironton is a disgrace, but it's also the cockroach you see. You know for sure there are thousands behind the wall.
Good morning brother. I live in Las Vegas which seems like an extension of Las Angeles these days.
Don't really want to hear about your lawsuits because you're not going to win them anyway don't show your s*** until you've done what you said you're going to do there's always something holding you up from doing it you're a loser chili
How do I email you
We get to improve our lives for a moment in time while enriching the lives of our owners in perpetuity.
1
Southeast Michigan. Blue water transparency!
Sarasota
You are not involved in Commerce