Is it Legal for a Family Court Judge to Search a House? – Big News Today – FIS Live No. 50



For the 50th episode of Freedom is Scary, I’ll announce big news happening today in the #FamilyCourt #JudgeSearch #CivilRights case where there was apparently some confusion over whether it’s legal for judges to search the homes of litigants appearing before them. Join me LIVE and 6:30 p.m. eastern. You won’t want to miss it.

UPDATE: read the federal lawsuit and learn more at the link:

Federal Suit Filed Against Family Court Judge and Deputies for Warrantless Search and Seizure



source

41 thoughts on “Is it Legal for a Family Court Judge to Search a House? – Big News Today – FIS Live No. 50”

  1. Did the judge make a profit from this action? I mean lawyers are paid, so was her judge also being compensated by the ex- wife? As far as I know judges are not allowed to perform any type of search, let alone theft of private property.

  2. You wonder why people like me can't stand a cop it's because they even sweep my son's death under the rug he was murdered just before Christmas and I've still heard nothing from these pigs they said they did a complete investigation which was a lie they said my son was coming to see me that's b***** because he left for my house to go see them at work

  3. Facebook is currently suppressing my freedom of speech along with Twitter and the rest of them They are afraid of people like me They bring forth nothing but truth and shine a light on all their corruption

  4. Cops do not work for the citizens they work for satans asshole, "government & big corporations" to create revenue. Big Money in doing so they are allowed to rape take, and murder the public. There's no such thing as a good cop!

  5. John, Doesn't this case also fall under USC Title 18 Crimes & Criminal Procedure Part 1 Chapter 13 Civil Rights § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights: "If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same….." (Being the Judge Conspiring with the Bailiff's to search his home without a warrant after him telling her she had to have a warrant and them then threatening to arrest him 7 times which leads into 242) and §242 Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law: "Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully (emphasis added to custom and willfully) subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the….." (with them all adding up to violations of his 4th, 5th & 14th amendments when she searched his house with her henchmen I mean Bailiffs without a warrant). Are you allowed to amend the complaint to add those 2 extra sections, I know in state courts the prosecutors are allowed to file amended complaints not sure about federal courts; also is the burden proof on the 18 USC 241 & 242 Codes similar to that of 42 USC 1983 Code?

  6. I live in ohio and I have live as a free man the whole time…no mask I havent delt with it have had only a handful of people give me any grief about it still didn't stop me tho I dont listen to signs unless there is a o.r.c under said sign

  7. There should be more constraints for people in the family court. Currently there are no prohibitions for mentally insane attorneys to practice is said courts. It should be the bare minimum because children are often involved. If an attorney is crazy enough to let a child get molested, or poison a parent, that attorney should be barred from participating in dissolution proceedings.

  8. Not only did she illegally search his home. But according to you she allowed the Ex-wife to take things from his home that WASN'T apart of the divorce proceedings. AND the other court official (wife's lawyer) allowed it to happen. He too should be punished

  9. You sir, are a hero. I very specifically decided not to be a lawyer because the more I learned about our constitutional rights, the more I learned the justice system continually tramples them. In order to be accepted by your peers and community, you're expected to go along with this system. I can only imagine the crap you've gone through to stand nearly alone and fight the good fight for the benefit of your fellow citizens. Best of all, you do it in a way without screaming at the drones of unintelligent mobs, but rather tastefully enough that hopefully others will follow your lead into a better way of thinking (or even thinking at all)

    I dont mean to butter your bread so thick, I just wanted to make sure you're aware that there are many of us out here who truly appreciate what you do, and love hearing about every case being fought. I've felt lucky more than not my home state of Missouri seems better than most at letting their citizenship live with less thranical rule than others, but the more it spreads, the better it becomes. Keep it up my friend! 🙂

  10. Your client was deprived of his right to record his encounter with a government official operating under color of law but apparently outside of his official capacity. IMHO.

    42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights

    Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.

  11. Thank you for you time and the update. If the judges don't follow the constitution. What recourse do we have? Then why should we the people follow any laws? Seems if you are a police officer, judge's,, government officials they are no rules or consequences at all. It is disgusting what is going on in United States with government period.

  12. California's Commission on Judicial Performance, AKA Protection, does nothing either. Judges are violating the law all the time ( reversal on appeal) , there should be more family court judges held accountable. For Pete Sake you had a judge on the council that thought that was okay! Hometowning, Thin Blue Line – protection that is violating public trust in our legal system. Family court judges are the most incompetent and the most corruptable in our system !

  13. Yes, point on every issue about that video- I used it too and was most upset they did not let him record what they were doing in his home! The police did it to me in a court file room , and that is why this 56 year old grandma started recording the cops. What you are doing is showing what binds us. No matter our polictics , race, religion – it is about holding our government officials accountable ! More views, more comments, more likes- best way to drive public officials nuts , in their personal capacity !

  14. God I love you ! Yes, it is and always was about the Karens and that and the pandemic is how we explain what is happening in family court and how you are explaining civil rights! Thank you so appreciate all of your work – am about to scare the Karens to the max- do you know how many Karens are getting put in jail by overpaid divorce lawyers in Santa Clara County.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top