Cops Tase & Arrest Gym Owner INSIDE His Gym | No Warrant



Video to submit? https://forms.gle/HmwnDQKvwvYPxe967
Blog: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/
Donate to the Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/support/give-now/thecivilrightslawyer/
For business inquiries: civilrightslawyer@ellify.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/johnbryanesq
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JohnBryanLaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/johnbryanesq/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

NOTE: We don’t condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system.

NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.

source

43 thoughts on “Cops Tase & Arrest Gym Owner INSIDE His Gym | No Warrant”

  1. This case is easily solved, cause and effect, the presence of the officers was the cause therefore without them being present the effect would not have occurred. Only a corrupt person would overlook this…oh wait

  2. Man lets be real in truth it's not base on law, they don't uphold. Might makes right, see why the second amendment audititor they don't molest their rights.James in America Chicago. Peace be onto you. 🤔😐😠😡

  3. Question: are the doors open to anyone to enter or are they restricted to members who need a fob to gain entry,? Can that membership be grounds to class the gym as private.?

  4. These are some cowards, using a taser against one man vs four to five officers, violating use of force policy, entered private property without a warrant and therefore it wasn’t a emergency situation for them to enter his property, they escalated the situation. The owner only used his freedom of speech at the police while entering his property, they forced their way in because their egos were being hurt. So, F the police.

  5. There was no call in regards to a noise disturbance, so the complaint is law enforcement? It seems as though the officers already had in mind to bully the business owner by self-creating the complaint and approaching someone that they've had interactions with previously while understanding the potential of escalating the situation. The business owner advised law enforcement of private property and that they are unwelcomed there. Are the police above the law here? It is my understanding even on private property that a business owner or representative of the business can request for individuals to leave and advise a trespass. There was no reason for the officers to continue to remain on private property and gather in greater numbers outside of this business for something that they could have just written up a noise disturbance citation and delivered it. The route officers took was to not de-escalate contact and continue to escalate contact with the business owner. The officers should have exercised learned de-escalating skills (unless unknown) which would have benefited this contact. I would bet these officers would have received training at some point for de-escalating situations and contact which would have been paid for by taxpayers. No excuse that these officers did not recognize being advised of private property and negative impact.to his clients and business by what can be perceived as intimidation. The officers did not need to enter private property and collude with each other outside of the business to what seems as a simple citation and deliver. The officers not only chose to stay on private property after being asked to leave but also to intimidate the business owner by surrounding him even entering into his business without consent and being advised not to.

  6. I find it interesting that if it is a pro law enforcement video or something that would have been on TV where police officers are excessive, violent or even when there's a scuffle as long as they post it there's no issues. When someone else posts the video not affiliated with pro law enforcement or law enforcement television all the sudden there are concerns about violence. It seems we are being taught violence is okay when it comes from the police, but violence is not okay when it comes from the public.
    Not only do we have to re-educate the judicial and executive branch. Now we have companies that are assisting with living in predated times where police brutality is acceptable. Hopefully their shareholders will speak up and do what's right for the greater community.

  7. When I get a noise disturbance call with an anonymous R.P. I just respond to the location and advise the person of the complaint and that's it. I don't ask for I.D. because I don't have a crime, since the "victim" of the disturbance is anonymous. I would just tell this guy "We got a noise disturbance call. If you could do me a favor and turn down the noise I'd appreciate it." Then I would leave.

  8. Officer kidnapped him and Voilative his amendment right , illegal arrested him and as a citizen he has the right to protect himself against unlawful process : self- defense because the cop grab him and attack him .

  9. The gym was a private club, not a normal business open to the public at that hour. Also, this obsession over needing ID by police to the point where they will arrest over it really needs to be gone after. We need better defined and known to the public and police times when ID needs to be given and when it can't with it being a federal standard.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top