33 thoughts on “HOUSTON VS HILL, 1987; RIGHT TO INTERRUPT”

  1. Well one thing is that he just admitted that they are a gang right??? So since they dont want to prosecute their own why cant we file charges on police for being a gang a terrorist gang now bc they are infringing on our rights also. On camera he said it so why are they still working as policmen??? Why dont they have a 40+ yr jail sentence for being in a gang and is active right now. Wheres the law when the law need the law??? Wheres our judges wheres our prosecutors and our D.A's bc we have to be fair all around the board bc if he was a civilian and his gang was out there they all be searched and harrassed and arrested for being active in a gang.

  2. See now this is what I'm talking about cops wanna stand on or try to make you believe that they can do whatever they want to do but yet you can't help people they can lie legally the police can I and and will not have to deal with the consequences in court but if you tell the truth do someone that they're engaging with that's a crime what the f*** stuff hot are you kidding me okay

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top