Get your “We Don’t Stop” T-shirt and your Indestructible Tri-Fold on DeletelawZ dot com — We Dont Stop —
THE TRANSPARENCY APP IS COMING VERY SOON!!
You should always use THE TRIFOLD That we sell on INDESTRUCTIBLE PAPER from the website DeleteLawZ dot com for $25.00. We ship it from Los Angeles. OR — get the Trifold you PRINT AT HOME for five dollars
DeleteLawZ dot com
Thanks,
Chille
@ChilleDeCastro PayPal
@Chille-DeCastro Venmo
$ChilleDeCastro Cashapp
Amazon Wishlist: https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/2OZO37IQE83BT/ref=nav_wishlist_lists_2
source
Dont discourage people from being a cop. if it wasn't for people like him we wouldn't have any cops. Teach them how to be a cop correctly…
They all act amd talk like robots. Its insane the way they act when talkin to the public in every situation. Its likw your not even talking to a person
You do realize Shili breaks the law quite a bit always playing on his phone while driving. smh… A constitutional law scholar my ass.
you are just annoying and d u m b π
Deep down some part of him realizes what youβre saying is trueβ¦ itβs the reason for him mumbling and walking away to cut you off. If he WHOLEHEARTEDLY believed he was doing the right thing he would have no problem standing there and defending himself with a proud demeanor.
Imagine calling someone else "butthurt" after suing a comedian for hurting your wittle feewings
BROWNS SHIRTS will always show their true color, which is thin and BLUE
Keep it up. We were and still are headed for a police state. No rights. I hope this country can see how entitled they think they are. Equality for all is what we need to strive for. Bustem out.
Delete this channel
You are a scumbag parasite and I feel dirty for watching your video
Las Vegas police department full of lying cowardly criminals
He brainwashed made to think that cops are the good guys.
What a loser, this is what you do when no one loves you.
Gifting you a Columbia necktie you POS
Its cringe every time you say, "and Im a Constitutional Law Scholar, not just some average joe." Since you're such a stickler for details, here is the definition. "Constitutional scholars refers to scholars operating in their academic capacity within a university or independent academic institution." I liken it to a woman whos shouting at you and says, "Im a strong independent woman" If you have to run around telling people something about yourself…odds are it's not true. Just saying.
What a dickhead. I'm no cop. Try that shit with people who aren't and see how far that shit gets you.
Ahahaha you are so afraid of everything, terrified !
A toddler !
Still doing everything to be a karen i see.
Your surving the comunity proud pls let me help
That cop totally Alfa maled you there beta boy. Threaten to sue then go change your underwear. If your going to claim being a scholar at least take one law class that is recognized officially. Google and YouTube donβt count neither dose talking to yourself in the mirror like a lawyer. Watching your slow mental breakdown is amusing.
hey, I have a question. why are you such a dumbass?
The Right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, SHALL NOT be violated,
AND NO Warrants shall issue (Exception to the violation of the above in regards to Reasonable Searches and Seizures – Warrant)
but upon Probable Cause (Proven to an officer of the court, to attain aforementioned warrants, which is the legal exception to not violating this right),
supported by Oath or affirmation (Oath means one's hand on the Bible or similar religious text, and affirmation for the non-religious),
AND particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Somehow from this we get officers having unilateral discretion to act upon unproven, un affirmed/unsworn, often even uncited, probable cause, without prior determination of this standing by a reasonable party (one which is disinterested in outcomes IE lacking the emotional attachment to the "investigation").
Really, how the 4th is written, only an unreasonable person, as trained by an indoctrination system, could believe that the issuance of a Warrant not be contingent for any arrest to be made.
I don't even except the narrative around exigency in this case. If a situation is truly exigent, then this means there is a life or death situation afoot, and this means that the normal rules for Self-Defense override any need to violate the 4th amendment.
It's just written this way. Only an unthinking person could interpret this otherwise.
I think people also think Probable doesn't have "reasonableness" attached to it as a standard. Reasonableness is subjective, and therefore, the most reasonable reasonableness is going to be a benefit of the doubt consideration, rather than someone's feelings about a matter. Since we have a standard of Innocent Until Proven Guilty, the benefit of the doubt should never be in the hands of one midwit who is directly connected with the case, or law enforcement for that matter. I disagree that Judges are the best for this, but they are the best this system has offered and has empowered with the writ of a Warrant. In a reasonable world, defense attorneys would be charged with this. Though I can imagine the upheaval from the safety and security blanket nanny state enthusiasts that this would lead to making search warrants impossible. I just argue it would render such things unnecessary, as we're simply shifting an impossible burden from one corruptible entity to another, though external (outside of the BAR connection) corruptible entity. As far as balancing the scales of justice however, this barely makes a scratch in the overwhelming resources the State has to bring to bear on the presumably innocent.
I sometimes feel I live in upside-down land.
What a punk Chilli is
You constantly misquote every single case law you cite. Even to the point of calling Thurgood Marshall's DISSENTING opinion as the HOLDING in Pennsylvania v Mimms. π€·π»ββοΈ You either lie about it or your an idiot who just can't understand what you read. I know which one I choose. π€¦π»ββοΈπ΄σ §σ ’σ ³σ £σ ΄σ Ώ
Chille has wet dreams about PLAYBOY cops and him in torture cuffs.
Nothing wrong with people being law enforcement we obviously need law enforcement to keep rules or else there would be chaos Mad Max chaos zombie apocalypse chaos and with that said it's good to film the police because they like to violate citizens rights many times specially the 4th and 1st
I just stumbled upon this I my first reaction is what a pathetic little troll you are! Then I find out your from my home state of Ohio I believe! Good God almighty dude get yourself a life before it's too late. You're too damn old to be acting like this
My question to Mr. Lawz, how do you maintain order when constitutional laws are broken and or not obeyed?
Are arrests not allowed?
They're being told and they're being trained you are either with us are you against us and we will take you out
When asked if he loves being a HERO, the ego driven narcissist said it all when he said "yes". The way he answered that one word tells us everything we need to know about that person.
Tin Badge Terrorists are programmed this way when talking to humans. It shows weakness if it is done any other way. They feel as though they command respect at all times, and their self-aggrandizement is sickening. When they lose the argument, they feel they have lost all control of the situation, so they will avoid the conversation by walking away and pouting like petulant children.
Never realized constitutional law scholars used the word 'dude' so much.