ID Refusal Becomes A MAJOR Lawsuit.



Andre Roxx (Full Video With BodyCam): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXEXu640E1k
Andre Roxx Twitter: https://twitter.com/realandreroxx
Presley v Florida: https://law.justia.com/cases/florida/supreme-court/2017/sc16-2089.html
Pennsylvania v Mimms: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1977/76-1830

Submit your video review: Lack@LackLusterVideo.com
Facebook Messenger: https://www.facebook.com/LackLusterVideos
https://lacklustervideo.com/videos

—Gear Recommendations—
Body Cam: https://amzn.to/2W5cEBh
Gimbal: https://amzn.to/2KkCmiM
GoPro: https://amzn.to/2W7UC1b
Radar/Laser Detector $$$: https://amzn.to/37LtQC2
Radar/Laser Detector $$: https://amzn.to/3bGyZfQ
Radar/Laser Detector $: https://amzn.to/3qVIiPz
DashCam $$$: https://amzn.to/3aHL5pO
DashCam $$: https://amzn.to/3mueNBv
DashCam $: https://amzn.to/37uQkaW

—Social Media—
https://wlo.link/@LackLuster
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LackLusterVideos/
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lackluster/
DISCORD: https://discord.gg/DCzTq4x
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DaleHillerYT
Instagram: lackluster_media
2nd Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w
Live Streams: https://www.twitch.tv/lacklusterlive
IOS MEMBERSHIPS: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbEPXqDvej-3mciZxwYmdew/join

—Channel Members—
Tony Routledge
Dennis Anderson
Shane Bushta
david cat & bus
JILL REITER
Bill B.
James B.
R and R
Dwaine Miller
Witch Hunt
Charles Clarke
Ken Hogg
Keiran Tibbits
Bob Lau
laura miller
Candie Anderson
Bob Balue
Annie V
Lynne Huffman
Ron Maguire
Wally Lumpkin
Justin Stringfield
Martin Whalley
madcat61207
Bowen Deming
Karl P
Lori Miller
Tiffany LaBeau
H HAMMOUD
neuroticknight

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

Disclaimer: NONE of my videos should be considered a “call to action.” The content is created to be educational or is newsworthy and of interest to the public.
I am not an attorney. My videos should not be construed as legal advice. You should seek legal counsel if you believe that you are a victim of police misconduct. The facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion. Laws, case law, ordinances, policies, legal doctrine, and all other jurisprudence is subject to the interpretation of the court. The videos shown are designed to be educational, and informative. They should never serve as legal advice under any circumstances. The content provided is in no way intended to provoke, incite or shock the viewer. My content was created to educate citizens about constitutionally protected activities, law, and civilian rights, and to emphasize the importance of constitutional awareness. All claims made are alleged.

No one disputes that Florida law enforcement officials have the authority to pull over drivers who have committed traffic infractions, but there is a huge issue with threatening to arrest Andre for declining the Deputies request for identification.
The officer alleges that in the state of Florida, passengers must identify, even if they played no direct part in the offense. But this is false absent probable cause for an arrest, or Reasonable Suspicion that the passenger has, is, or is about to commit a crime.
in 2017, the florida supreme court ruled on Presley v Florida, and held that law enforcement officers may, as a matter of course, detain the passengers of a vehicle for the reasonable duration of a traffic stop without violating the Fourth Amendment.
Deputy Dunn turns off his bodycam, presumably to speak with a supervisor to determine the legality of the stop. It is turned back on shortly after as he speaks to Deputy Ramos, who tell Dunn that they are allowed to run the k9 around the vehicle and that they need to remove the vehicle’s occupants.
In the Supreme court case of Pennsylvania v Mimms, the court held that asking the occupants to exit the vehicle was a minimal and reasonable intrusion of their freedom.
Andres video was shut off as he was placed under arrest on a misdemeanor charge of resisting an officer and obstructing without violence. He was freed hours later after posting $150 bail.
Andre fought the charges in criminal court and eventually had the charges dismissed.
He is now suing in federal court under 42 USC 1983 Civil action for deprivation of rights. His case recently went through mediation but Andre isn’t looking for a settlement.

#1stAmendment #Audit #CopsOwned

source

40 thoughts on “ID Refusal Becomes A MAJOR Lawsuit.”

  1. I remember when police would come to our school and show us different stuff. Everyone wanted to be a cop on the playground.
    So what happened?
    Two things happened.
    First there was a Supreme Court ruling that recognized it is impossible for a police officer to know each and every law he is supposed to enforce, giving them Qualified Immunity. Even though every cop has excess to States Attorneys, City Attorneys and Prosecuting Attorneys to clarify the law on the spot, a luxury no American citizen has.
    Second, the police force's became Unionized. Now they dictate what is taught at the Police Academy's instead of the City Council. And the Police Unions eliminated the sections on RAS, the Constitutional/Civil Rights of citizens and tell their Officer's to never admit to knowing any law because that would nullify their Qualified Immunity and that's why he muted his body camera. Why not just be a law abiding cop? The Unions have plenty of money for attorneys and all of their friends work in the court system. Witnesses for the prosection damn near daily.
    Just think about what Qualified Immunity means! A cop is Immuned from violating a United States citizens Constitutional/Civil Rights! Immuned! That is so ridiculous that States are nullifying Qualified Immunity. Good for them!

  2. Great video. Did those "ignorant of the law" cops face any charges for their illegal actions. Did the victims of these bored cops obtain any compensation for the disruption to their travel and requirement to seek court intervention for police abuse of law.

  3. It's typical police behavior, no surprises here. And all expense free . Mine or yours ignorance of the law is no excuse but trained law enforcement ignorance of the law is justifiable, fair ??

  4. Officer should not have the ability to turn off the body camera. Everything that happens during the stop should be considered evidence. And by turning that camera off, you’re basically Destroying evidence. And now a canine. This is corruption

  5. They’re either knowingly lying which From a moral and ethical standpoint says they should not be cops are allowed to touch a firearm. Or they are so uneducated and ignorant of their job, which means they have no business being on the street with a firearm!

  6. I would’ve made them arrest me and charge me so I can go after them for unlawful detention unlawful arrest unlawful incarceration as well as several charges my declaration of rights of the color of law. On top of that their shining the light directly at the phone. Violation of rights. You cannot interfere with the citizens rights to film. You don’t want to be on camera don’t do the job.

  7. I will never understand why so many police officers seem to think they have the right to ID anyone they want. 90% of the videos I see involve someone being threatened with arrest for failure to identify. And then argue that it is required. Yet it’s not. How do police not know this? And why do they seem to think that anyone who doesn’t want to give their identity must be guilty of something?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top