Bridging the Divide – A conversation worth hearing – Talking about the things



Get your Trifolds and 5th Amendment Cop Cards on www.DeleteLawZ.com
Thanks,
Chille
@ChilleDeCastro PayPal
@Chille-DeCastro Venmo
$ChilleDeCastro Cashapp

source

22 thoughts on “Bridging the Divide – A conversation worth hearing – Talking about the things”

  1. You will not bridge nothing speaking to him
    He respected you and listened while acting cool
    He said you should present it
    You are better at it
    So basically he listened and respected you
    But he loves the gig
    The only thing on his mind was pension plan
    That was why he was doing what he was doing
    Hunting a victim down to steal their money
    He gonna be a lawyer
    So now he is gonna steal more money in that venture
    But he is waiting till he is eligible for his pension plan
    That is the thinking of most of them
    Then they own a restaraunt or dunk in donuts or whatever
    In his case it paying for law so he can still steal legally
    They have a great thing going
    They steal legally
    Why change it

  2. Not only do cops do that they also all try there hardest to be crybabies if you do have a legal gan and try there best to violate your 2nd amendment and try to make it the cops are only ones with asault weapens so they can beat unarmed people so they can feel in charge

  3. I have said that for years. If cops cared about people following the law they would have all brightly colored cars so people saw them. Instead they hide and trick people to give them a ticket. They care more about the revenue than the actual crime.

  4. If you want to talk to somebody and make REAL CHANGE, talk to legislators and the Federal constituents who can make things change. Rally groups together to protest on this subject until police policy and procedure all across the US is changed!! Or else I will beat you to it! 🚫🐁🐷👌

  5. Chiile, a cop in a small New England town (I know because I live in a small New England town) is alot different than the sheriff's in We Ho or the L. A. P. D. What about people who are angry drunk of out their mind or are on drugs? My Dad was a chemist and he was an alcoholic, he flipped a new Lincoln and fought with the cops that arrived. Ì can see your idea probably working for non violent offenders of simple crimes, but I feel most of those people if they have never had an FTA (failure to appear) should be given a citation vs going to jail to be bonded out, which is part of the problem with most states having bail bond companies that are for profit and then the tow companies that are going to charge to tow your car and charge a daily storage rate. What about non violent offenders who once in the police car and get scared and try to get out? Cops in small New England towns ride alone and backup could be 15 minutes or more out, so their safety is a concern. The People's Court was not in the 1970's, it started in 1981. Judge Wapner and Mrs. Wapner lived near where my Dad in Sherman Oaks, but they moved over the hill to a bigger house after Judge Wapner got some People's Court Money.

  6. @08:32 Chile: "I'm for Rule of Law!!!" Peace Keeper: Smiles and says "Hell Yeah!!"

    Now, there is something inherently WRONG with that.

    I GET that ALL of "The Old, Dead Guys" have been read… WHY do we not TAKE those writings and have a "Meeting of The Minds", of GREATER, Live Dudes… Dudes of TODAY?? That have SEEN the fallacies of what these "Dead Guys" have written and write our OWN books…??? Our OWN way of "law"??

    It's just when he's (TTBL) about to jump-up for joy when Chile says "…Rule of Law!!!", then I HAVE to wonder… JUST sayin', that's all. : )

  7. Most police departments provide adequate and proper training in their police academies which is consistant with their official lawful departmental policy, but the transition to impropper unlawful training occurs when the rookie police officers are intentionally assigned to corrupt Field Training Officers so they become re-trained in unofficial unlawful policy to make all officers more effective in reducing crime or the perception of crime through NOBILE CAUSE POLICE CORRUPTION. The ends justify the means. The Chief Executive Officer of the Executive Branch of the local, state and federal government appoint most police chiefs or police commissioners. These Chief Executive Officers want to stay in office and get re-elected when the term of their office ends so they are and become obsessed with the reduction of crime so they appoint a police commissioner etc. who is willing to compromise his professional and moral integrity to implement and promote unofficial unlawful policy which causes police officers to transition from their official lawful role to an unofficial unlawful role. This newly created role causes police officers to become outlaws and criminals because their new role requires them to reduce crime at all cost even violating citizens' rights. So now when police conduct law enforcement activity they act under color of law or appearence of law, so they fail and refuse to follow the law because they are defacto police officers. Many police are not acting in their official capacity because they are acting beyond the scope or their authority or employment, since they are acting in their unofficial unlawful role as outlaws and criminals first then they are pretending to be and act as police officers that follow the rule of law. Qualified Immunity indemnifies or holds them not civilly liable for intentionally, knowingly, willfully, with deliberate indifference or malice violates many laws in the normal course of discharging their duties. The police intentionally error on the side of violating the law instead of error on the side of following and complying with the laws. The unofficial unlawful role guides, directs and causes all of these lawless and unwarranted law enforcement actions to be taken even though they are against the law and against official lawful departmental policy.

  8. According to the Magna Carta Clause 45 it states: We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or there Officials, only men that know the law of the realm and are minded to keep it well. This means that the U.S. Supreme Court's "sudden discovery" in the 1960"s that police officers are entitled to the Affiramitive Defense Of Qualified Immunity is against the U.S. Constitution and is Null and Void. Granting Qualified Immunity to police officers is the same as authorizing and immunizing the Nazis to murder because they were ordered to and just doing their job. The requirements of their job are limited to lawful and moral conduct consistant with Common Law, Natural Law and God's Law

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top