Worst Cops I’ve Seen.



Submit your video:
https://forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6

Clinton Police: https://www.facebook.com/clintonarpolice/
Van Buren County Sheriff: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064348492635

The Random Patriot:
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ub8pToMGnNM
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro1BWzvRMQQ

Nance’s Questionable Shoot – https://youtu.be/R6lL3k5hd9M
Lt. Scott Solomon
Sheriff Eric Koonce

Help me launch https://attorney-shield.com
Become a founding member!
About the app: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6tBMHB-Lcw

LackLuster Media LLC
PO Box 514
Chester, WV 26034

Best Dashcam – https://amzn.to/45fVYsW
MERCH – https://www.youtube.com/@LackLusterMedia/store
Gimbal – https://amzn.to/45tZyzd
Camera 1 – https://amzn.to/3x1gn3L
Camera 2 – https://amzn.to/3slCrbD
Radar/Laser Detector – https://amzn.to/3P10Wnt

– – Other Channels – –
The Odd Side: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw
LackLuster Clips: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w

– – Social – –
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lacklustermedia.official
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DaleHillerYT
DISCORD: https://discord.gg/SUcPuym
IG: https://www.instagram.com/lackluster_media/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lackluster_official
Project1983.org

I receive commissions from featured links on verified purchases, at no cost to you.

Did you know that Law Enforcement Agencies and Public Officials can’t block your criticism on social media? If you choose to comment on a public forum such as Twitter or Facebook, they can’t delete comments they don’t agree with. Want to learn more? https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/court-rules-public-officials-cant-block-critics-facebook

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

Disclaimer: Our videos and other published media should not be construed as legal advice. We are not attorneys, more importantly, we are not your attorney. Seek legal counsel if you believe you are a victim of police misconduct. Facts presented in publications are not indicative of personal opinions. are designed to be educational and informative, based on the information available at the time. Laws, case law, ordinances, policies, legal doctrine, and all other jurisprudence is subject to the interpretation of the court. We in no way intended to provoke, incite or shock the viewer and should never be considered a ‘call to action’.

Submitting a video either digitally or through physical devices is not a guarantee that your video will be published. Devices, documents, and any other items sent to our PO Box will not be returned unless a self addressed, postage paid, return envelope is included with your package.

All claims made are alleged, so if you see a mistake or misrepresentation, email us to let us know how we can remedy the issue immediately.

Lack@LackLusterVideo.com

#LackLuster #Cops #Police

source

39 thoughts on “Worst Cops I’ve Seen.”

  1. Clinton Police: https://www.facebook.com/clintonarpolice/
    Lt. Scott Solomon
    Van Buren County Sheriff: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064348492635
    Sheriff Eric Koonce

    The Random Patriot:

    Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ub8pToMGnNM

    Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro1BWzvRMQQ

    Nance’s Questionable Shoot – https://youtu.be/R6lL3k5hd9M

    Submit your video:

    https://forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6

    Attorney Shield is LIVE! https://attorney-shield.com

    About the app: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6tBMHB-Lcw

    LackLuster Media LLC

    PO Box 514

    Chester, WV 26034

    Best Dashcam – https://amzn.to/45fVYsW

    MERCH – https://www.youtube.com/@LackLusterMedia/store

    Gimbal – https://amzn.to/45tZyzd

    Camera 1 – https://amzn.to/3x1gn3L

    Camera 2 – https://amzn.to/3slCrbD

    Radar/Laser Detector – https://amzn.to/3P10Wnt

    – – Other Channels – –

    The Odd Side: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw

    LackLuster Clips: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w

    – – Social – –

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lacklustermedia.official

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/DaleHillerYT

    DISCORD: https://discord.gg/SUcPuym

    IG: https://www.instagram.com/lackluster_media/

    TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lackluster_official

    Project1983.org

    I receive commissions from featured links on verified purchases, at no cost to you.

  2. I really hate it when the cops think that the auditors do this just to cause a problem. They don't want the public to be educated. Probably so they can keep abusing the public. Does this sheriff even have the capability to see how stupid he looks. Big problem cops are supposed to uphold the constitution, but none of them really know it.

  3. 2:40 “There is no such thing as a stop and ID state.”

    Then why the Supreme Court use the term “stop and identify state” in Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty., 542 US 177 – Supreme Court 2004?

    {NRS § 171.123(3) is an enactment sometimes referred to as a "stop and identify" statute. See Ala. Code § 15-5-30 (West 2003); Ark. Code Ann. § 5-71-213(a)(1) (2004); Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-3-103(1) (2003); Del. Code Ann., Tit. 11, §§ 1902(a), 1321(6) (2003); Fla. Stat. § 856.021(2) (2003); Ga. Code Ann. § 16-11-36(b) (2003); Ill. Comp. Stat., ch. 725, § 5/107-14 (2004); Kan. Stat. Ann. § 22-2402(1) (2003); La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann., Art. 215.1(A) (West 2004); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 84.710(2) (2003); Mont. Code Ann. § 46-5-401(2)(a) (2003); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-829 (2003); N. H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 594:2 and 644:6 (Lexis 2003); N. M. Stat. Ann. § 30-22-3 (2004); N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 140.50(1) (West 2004); N. D. Cent. Code § 29-29-21 (2003); R. I. Gen. Laws § 12-7-1 (2003); Utah Code Ann. § 77-7-15 (2003); Vt. Stat. Ann., Tit. 24, § 1983 (Supp. 2003); Wis. Stat. § 968.24 (2003). See also Note, Stop and Identify Statutes: A New Form of an Inadequate Solution to an Old Problem, 12 Rutgers L. J. 585 (1981); Note, Stop-and-Identify Statutes After Kolender v. Lawson: Exploring *183 the Fourth and Fifth Amendment Issues, 69 Iowa L. Rev. 1057 (1984).

    Stop and identify statutes often combine elements of traditional vagrancy laws with provisions intended to regulate police behavior in the course of investigatory stops. The statutes vary from State to State, but all permit an officer to ask or require a suspect to disclose his identity. A few States model their statutes on the Uniform Arrest Act, a model code that permits an officer to stop a person reasonably suspected of committing a crime and "demand of him his name, address, business abroad and whither he is going." Warner, The Uniform Arrest Act, 28 Va. L. Rev. 315, 344 (1942). Other statutes are based on the text proposed by the American Law Institute as part of the Institute's Model Penal Code. See ALI, Model Penal Code § 250.6, Comment 4, pp. 392-393 (1980). The provision, originally designated § 250.12, provides that a person who is loitering "under circumstances which justify suspicion that he may be engaged or about to engage in crime commits a violation if he refuses the request of a peace officer that he identify himself and give a reasonably credible account of the lawfulness of his conduct and purposes." § 250.12 (Tent. Draft No. 13) (1961). In some States, a suspect's refusal to identify himself is a misdemeanor offense or civil violation; in others, it is a factor to be considered in whether the suspect has violated loitering laws. In other States, a suspect may decline to identify himself without penalty.}
    —Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty., 542 US 177 – Supreme Court 2004

  4. Well I've heard the term ignorant pig but I've never seen a full pen! What does the Sheriff say if someone from out of county gets robbed in his? I don't serve you because you're not from here… Provincial idiot! Going by their figures I believe that fast food may be responsible for their lack of intellect!

  5. Kudo's to being respectful until a reason to not be was given, I am seeing more and more just poor behavior from auditors, no one is going to take your side if your a jerk, even if you are right.

  6. Federal law ONLY supercedes State law on matters that were delegated by the States to the federal gov't in the Constitution. All matters not in the Federal Constitution are the jurisdiction of the States (10th Amendment) and Federal law does NOT supercede it.

  7. .. “the United States Supreme Court ruled that a police officer could not arrest a citizen merely for refusing to present identification.” (Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 1983)

  8. This stupid cop it is because of the constitution that she the people have the wright to carry because if it is up to the cops no one would be carrying a weapon. Idiot sheriff imagine and they are that one that are really supposed to fallow the constitution

  9. If this county does not serve people who come from outside of that county, then the federal government simply should not provide federal funds of any sort to the law enforcement of that county.

  10. AND A POLICE OFFICER CANT BE THE COMPLAINING PARTY, THESE TYRANNICAL PIGGYS ARE OFF THERE ROCKER , THE STATE STATUE ABSOLUTELY DOESN'T OVER RULE THE FEDERAL STATUE THESE ABSOLUTELY NO WAY IN HELL

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top