Submit your video:
https://forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6
Help me launch https://attorney-shield.com
Become a founding member!
About the app: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6tBMHB-Lcw
LackLuster Media LLC
PO Box 514
Chester, WV 26034
Best Dashcam – https://amzn.to/45fVYsW
MERCH – https://www.youtube.com/@LackLusterMedia/store
Gimbal – https://amzn.to/45tZyzd
Camera 1 – https://amzn.to/3x1gn3L
Camera 2 – https://amzn.to/3slCrbD
Radar/Laser Detector – https://amzn.to/3P10Wnt
– – Other Channels – –
The Odd Side: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw
LackLuster Clips: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w
– – Social – –
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lacklustermedia.official
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DaleHillerYT
DISCORD: https://discord.gg/SUcPuym
IG: https://www.instagram.com/lackluster_media/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lackluster_official
Project1983.org
I receive commissions from featured links on verified purchases, at no cost to you.
Did you know that Law Enforcement Agencies and Public Officials can’t block your criticism on social media? If you choose to comment on a public forum such as Twitter or Facebook, they can’t delete comments they don’t agree with. Want to learn more? https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/court-rules-public-officials-cant-block-critics-facebook
FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
Disclaimer: Our videos and other published media should not be construed as legal advice. We are not attorneys, more importantly, we are not your attorney. Seek legal counsel if you believe you are a victim of police misconduct. Facts presented in publications are not indicative of personal opinions. are designed to be educational and informative, based on the information available at the time. Laws, case law, ordinances, policies, legal doctrine, and all other jurisprudence is subject to the interpretation of the court. We in no way intended to provoke, incite or shock the viewer and should never be considered a ‘call to action’.
Submitting a video either digitally or through physical devices is not a guarantee that your video will be published. Devices, documents, and any other items sent to our PO Box will not be returned unless a self addressed, postage paid, return envelope is included with your package.
All claims made are alleged, so if you see a mistake or misrepresentation, email us to let us know how we can remedy the issue immediately.
Lack@LackLusterVideo.com
#LackLuster #Cops #Police
source
Fishing
Hirler/China/North Korea and many other dictators laws and rules have taken over the United States of America people. But the most dumbest part of all is,it's our tax dollars being utilized to pay dictator minions. Wow!!
Maybe you should stop harassing people and the cops wouldn’t bother you.
Taking pictures on your phone cannot be considered disorderly conduct…. this fucking putz…
Fuck the police
That cop sounds so ridiculous it's sad that someone actually gets paid to be this ignorant and violate people's freedoms.
this is exactly why they make laws so vague, so they can use them however they please.
Why would he need proof of insurance? The cop is a fool and clown. He needs retrained and or fired.
You Rude Human!
"What crime have I committed?'
Cop-"Pause..Thinking…well,.it can be ..considered ..disorderly conduct".
Cop was fishing for a crime to charge him with.Simple harassment.
You cannot criminalize a constitutionally protected activity as long as it’s done within lawful means. And the attempt to criminalize it just because someone doesn’t like it or you don’t like it, that in itself could be criminal. Deprivation of someone’s right on the color of law. If you’re not smart enough as an officer to know better, you never should be wearing the badge
Don’t trust cops
Hope he sued him, the department and the county for this Illegal stop. #lawyer #viral
This cop doesn’t even understand the law.
So he can't just take your word that you aren't doing anything wrong…. but he can believe a random callers accusations?
Typical manipulative cop clown 🤡. It really is crazy when think about how manipulative they really are. Some of The manipulation tactics are borderline psychopathic in nature, as well as the way they operate. Doesn't mean the individual is necessarily a psychopath, but when you really examine closely how they operate, it's hard not to see the similarities.
An Arrest is an Arrest. Whether a crime was committed or not, Congratulations, you now have an Arrest Record. For Nothing.
How does an id prove what a person is doing?
Yes cop you do.
NO YOU COP ARE WRONG.
Oh dear, this cop needs training
This cop is so ignorant
Typical deliberately willfull criminal and corrupt cop escalating no crime. The cop is the blatant criminal
Cop belongs in prison
Smart cops are a liability. They WANT dumb cops.
This cop said 'Intrusiveness" is a crime. Buddy your better build bigger prisons
Tyranny is here folks, big brother is watching and our freedoms are only an illusion
Streets are the city or state area you arent allowed to PARK AT, not a park.
1. Always record the police.
2. Always get their names and badge numbers.
3. Always ask, "Am I free to leave?"
4. Always ask for a supervisor.
5. Always remember you have the right to disobey an unlawful order from the police if you are confident they won't be able to demonstrate in court that the order was warranted and made necessary by your conduct. An arrest following refusal to obey an unwarranted police order is unlawful.
6. Always remember you have the right to refuse to identify yourself if you're confident that the police won't be able to demonstrate in court reasonable suspicion of your involvement in a crime; otherwise, provide your full name and nothing more, especially if threatened with arrest.
7. Always tell the cops, "I don't consent to any searches or seizures, and I won't answer questions."
8. Never argue with the police!
9. Never resist arrest! Unless you can do so safely and you have a valid reason like: self defense or defense of others, unlawful arrest, excessive force, necessity, mistake of fact, duress or coercion, malicious prosecution, preventing a crime, protecting property, medical emergency etc.
10. Always get a lawyer and sue when your rights are violated, targeting individual officers, their department and the municipality.
To streamline the process during a traffic stop, please print or write out the following statement to present to the police officer along with your license, registration, and proof of insurance:
—————————————————————-
WARNING OF LEGAL ACTION FOR RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
1. You are hereby informed of my expectations during our interaction, which are lawful and reasonable. Any deviation from these expectations may result in potential legal consequences.
2. Under the Fourth Amendment, I decline any searches or seizures. Additionally, in accordance with the Fifth Amendment, I affirm my right to remain silent.
3. I understand that during a routine traffic stop, suspicions may arise. However, I am under no obligation to prove my innocence. Moreover, I kindly request that our interaction remains prompt and lawful. I have other commitments and would appreciate your cooperation in avoiding unnecessary delays.
4. Acknowledging safety concerns, I want to confirm that I am unarmed and have no weapons in the vehicle. I'll keep my hands visible on the wheel and use recording devices to document the interaction for transparency. I'll briefly lower the window for document exchange, ensuring it's securely closed afterward. I will not exit the vehicle unless lawfully arrested.
5. Please be aware that any violation of my rights or unlawful actions may result in legal action, including civil lawsuits, criminal charges, and federal prosecution pursued against individual officers, their respective police departments, and the municipality.
6. In the absence of reasonable articulable suspicion that I am involved in a crime, it would be unreasonable for you to become suspicious after reading this document. Treating law-abiding citizens as criminals is unacceptable in a democratic society. I expect you to respect my rights, as per your oath to uphold the Constitution.
Your strict compliance with the law is earnestly anticipated.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
—————————————————————-
HOW QUALIFIED IMMUNITY WORKS
Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine that shields government officials, including law enforcement officers, from civil liability for actions performed within their official capacity, as long as those actions do not violate "clearly established" constitutional rights. However, there are certain circumstances where qualified immunity might not protect police officers:
1. Violation of Clearly Established Law: If a police officer violates a constitutional right that has been clearly established by existing case law, qualified immunity may not apply. In such cases, the court determines whether the law was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.
2. Excessive Use of Force: If a police officer uses excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, qualified immunity may not shield them from liability. Courts examine the specific circumstances of each case to determine whether the force used was objectively reasonable.
3. Malicious Conduct: Qualified immunity does not protect officers who engage in malicious conduct or who knowingly violate the law. If it can be shown that an officer acted with malicious intent or deliberately disregarded someone's constitutional rights, they may not be entitled to qualified immunity.
4. Gross Negligence: In cases where an officer's conduct demonstrates gross negligence or reckless disregard for the rights of others, qualified immunity might not apply. Courts may find that such conduct goes beyond the scope of official duties and therefore does not merit immunity.
5. Violation of Clearly Established Policies or Procedures: If a police officer violates departmental policies or procedures, which are designed to protect individuals' rights, qualified immunity may not shield them from liability. Adherence to departmental protocols does not automatically grant immunity if those actions still violate constitutional rights.
6. Lack of Subjective Reasonableness: Even if an officer's actions are deemed objectively reasonable under the circumstances, if the officer's subjective intent is malicious or in bad faith, qualified immunity might not apply.
—————————————————————-
PERSONAL OPINION
Terry v. Ohio, a landmark Supreme Court case, established the legal precedent for the "stop and frisk" practice, enabling law enforcement officers to detain and search individuals based on reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause. While proponents argue that Terry stops are essential for crime prevention and public safety, there are compelling reasons why this ruling should be overturned.
First and foremost, Terry v. Ohio infringes upon fundamental constitutional rights, particularly the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Allowing law enforcement officers to detain and search individuals without probable cause undermines the core principles of privacy and individual liberty that are enshrined in the Constitution. Our rights should not be subject to suspension or compromise based solely on an officer's suspicion or intuition.
Moreover, the implementation of Terry stops disproportionately targets marginalized communities, particularly people of color. Numerous studies have shown that stop and frisk policies result in racial profiling and discriminatory practices by law enforcement agencies. This systemic bias not only violates the principles of equal protection under the law but also fosters distrust and resentment within communities, exacerbating tensions between law enforcement and the public they are meant to serve.
Furthermore, the effectiveness of Terry stops in preventing crime is highly questionable. While proponents argue that these stops are necessary for proactive policing and crime deterrence, there is limited evidence to support their efficacy. In many cases, Terry stops yield minimal results in terms of crime prevention or the discovery of contraband or weapons. Instead, they often lead to the harassment and intimidation of innocent individuals, eroding trust in law enforcement and hindering community cooperation.
In light of these concerns, it is imperative that Terry v. Ohio be overturned. Law enforcement officers should be required to adhere to strict standards of probable cause when conducting searches and seizures, ensuring that our constitutional rights are upheld and protected. Exceptions to this standard should be rare and justified, based on credible evidence that is admissible in a court of law.
In conclusion, the preservation of individual rights and civil liberties is paramount in a democratic society. Terry v. Ohio represents a troubling erosion of these rights and sets a dangerous precedent for unchecked police authority. It is time for the Supreme Court to reevaluate this decision and reaffirm the principles of justice, equality, and constitutional protections for all individuals.
Must be Duluth.. those cops are not trained properly
I am not allowed to give my true opinion about cops anymore or they will censor my comment I guess it’s because they are scared to many people might have the same opinion about dirty cops
In some cases it could be consider disorderly. It would have to depend on the scenario. In this case it’s not. He’s just walking on a public sidewalk filming houses, now if he was walking filming houses, flicking people off or starting to yell at people or complain about the way they were parked, you could definitely articulate that. Also, a police officer CAN ask for your ID even if you’re not detained, you do not have to provide it if you’re not detained. It also can be used as evidence, if he runs your name and you’re a convicted felon or a sex offender or career criminal it, there are a lot of things you can’t do. And one more thing, to the people saying this officer isn’t educated, it’s hard to determine that off of one video. He is trying to find the gray area in a statute. Statutes generally aren’t specific which is why case law exists, often times it’s easy to find a gray area where something could be considered disorderly based off a word In the statute, how likely is a conviction in that scenario? Not likely.
Lack of education, vetting, training, supervision, oversight, and accountability. When are we going to stop scraping the bottom of the barrel?
When an officer feels the need to manipulate the law to satisfy his own needs there’s a problem. This cop is prepared to violate this man’s rights to satisfy his own and other feelings. Officer you can’t violate rights on hunches
This cop should be fired. They are all so ignorant.
Supreme Court ruled filming is constitutionally protected, and a constitutionally protected rights can not be considered illegal suspicious or anything g of those manners. Just like how obstruction us a physical act.
I guess these police officers never watch YouTube because these videos just keep appearing. Another narcissistic sociopath with a badge and a gun. And, no common sense.
"Intrusive and disorderly conduct" is the biggest bunch of B.S. I have ever heard of for photography.
Have you witnessed me commit a crime? Is my license going to confirm i am currently committing a crime? Are you stripping me or attempting to strip me of constitutional rights?
Why are people like you on YouTube your channel is pointless
Minority report
Cops are overreaching for anything these days
This Clip shows exactly Why all of those who wear the uniform MUST have at least two years of Law school training before being allowed to enter the Police Academy!! And Qualified immunity needs to be taken away and Replaced with a Personal liability insurance policy to get a job in Law enforcement!!
THIS COP KNOWS HE IS IN THE WRONG, BUT DOES NOT CARE.
HIS EGO IS BRUISED AND HIS WARPED MIND FEELS THREARENED.
HE WILL ARREST JUST TO PROVE HIS POWER OVER YOU.
WHILE KNOWING FULL WELL THE ARREST WILL BE DISMISSED ONLY IF VICTIM HAS KNOWLEDGE OF RIGHTS AND CAN AFFORD A LAWYER.
HE KNOWS THERE ARE NO PENALTIES TO HIM PERSONALLY FROM WITHIN HIS DEPARTMENT, OR BY THEIR PARTNERS IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, AND ELECTED OFFICIALS.
SUPREME COURT HAS RULED COPS CAN LEGALY LIE TO CITIZENS, BUT NOT TO ELECTED OFFICIALS.
Trying 2 b a bully, WOW
Typical tyrant
How would showing his ID help in the investigation?
Is there a list of names of people that are not allowed to have cell phones or cameras?
Who would have compiled this list?
Is it based on gender? Political affiliation? Or Race?
The cop is just reaching and searching for something he could arrest/ticket a law abiding citizen for.
End qualified immunity now
Transparency sucks for the corrupt.
It's so sad that it's gotten ti the point here where you really need to have a decoy camera and another more hidden camera otherwise they do their best to take them..
I hate the police with a burning passion. Along with more than half the nation.