ANONYMOUS Letter | Judge Impeachment UPDATE



Here’s the latest information I’ve received on the status of the impeachment proceedings in the West Virginia legislature, seeking to remove Family Court Judge Louise Goldston. Apparently, political pressure is being exerted behind-the-scenes. Additionally, an anonymous letter was sent to eight legislators set to vote on the impeachment.

Details/Links: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/2023/01/27/family-court-judge-impeachment-update/

Your help is needed!
Link to the contact info for all members of the WV House of Delegates: https://www.wvlegislature.gov/House/roster.cfm

Last Update Video: https://youtu.be/JOGxOLokjj4

Original Search Video: https://youtu.be/f9duAPB9SwI

Video to submit? https://forms.gle/HmwnDQKvwvYPxe967

For business inquiries: civilrightslawyer@ellify.com

Twitter: https://twitter.com/johnbryanesq

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JohnBryanLaw

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

NOTE: We don’t condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system.

NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.

source

36 thoughts on “ANONYMOUS Letter | Judge Impeachment UPDATE”

  1. Google, Judge Donna Davenport. None of the DA.'s or lawyers in her courtroom have been punished. They work in other counties now. Does a Family Court Judge's oath of office require them to defend the constitution, because they steal children over trivial "neglect" BS. while Tennesse DCS is constantly abusing children by the hundreds every day.

  2. Wow, hold the light on the bad acts going on behind the scenes. She decided the fate of children and their safety…imagine how sadistic she couldve been, covertly. Abusers side with abusers. That goes for ALL of them in the club

  3. When I Was Young And Dumb,
    (Back in the early 80's)
    I Ran With A Pretty Shady Crowd,
    One day l found myself up in South Detroit, At A Buddies In-laws place,
    After About An Hour,
    And With Steady Traffic,
    Of VERY Well Dressed Men ,
    Had Filed Thru the place,
    My curiosity Over took,
    So l asked,
    And Was Promptly Told,
    THESE Men,
    Were None Other Than,
    THE DETROIT D.A.,
    THE ASSISTANT D.A.,
    A DISTRICT JUDGE,
    SEVERAL PROMINENT ATTORNEYS,
    AND A COUPLE DETROIT COPS,
    Seems There Was A Party That Weekend, And They Were Getting Party Supplies,
    (coke, hash, pot)
    Go figure, huh

  4. i need you… my home was invaded, literally by town 'volunteers ' that actually stuck their 'letter" on my bedroom door… in my home! that is not a traditional house….
    reported it to the local cop patty Mclaughlin in millinocket maine and was ignored….. no report on record .. I have, do not trespass signs up and.. now the cop is on leave due to another lawsuit.. don't know what to do

  5. First let's clarify, Immunity is ONLY an afforded protection embedded under the law, at the intersection of the Law where all processes and procedures clearly stated in the relevant portions of the Law pertaining to the case have been properly followed, where the word MUST is a Command to Do, the word SHALL offers discretion to redirect the matter before the court to lesser or more stringent set of laws and where the words SHALL NEVER is a clear indication of punishment to be served should voices ever rise to the heights where people are raising concerns over actions that go strongly against them all. These people adjoining in support are doing so in fear of punishment, but had the Laws been followed as they were written there would be no need to address the discipline now required for them all. The balance of justice is not an easy undertaking by people who have assumed these positions for the pure desires of control and having the power of control over others, it underminds the original concepts of freedom. They all need to be punished including a hard hit in their wallets.

  6. I'm sorry, but you can't install a backbone in a state legislator after he/she has been elected to office. It's impossible. The best you can do is to keep track of whatever misdeeds they do in office and vote against them in the next election – if you think you can improve on the choices available. THAT'S POLITICS. Always has been. Always will be.

    The entire political establishment is corrupt from top to bottom including the police, city councils, county officials, the state legislature (senators and representatives) and upwards from there. The few exceptions that reveal themselves to be "one of the boys (or girls)" are usually gone after a short time, thanks to the ones who "play the game" for their own benefit. If scattershot were used rather than a slug, few innocent people would be injured.

    Allowing her (or any other similarly guilty government employee) to resign without charges is evidence of the corruption that continues – just by the other ones remaining in office

  7. She absolutely violated the constitutional rights of those before her court! They need to realize that this calls into question the legitimacy of all of her prior rulings. This also goes against instilling the trust of the public in the judicial process.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top