All you have to do now is give them restraining orders to prevent FURTHER retribution while you pursue their police certifications and surety bond.. be safe and end careers
Cops are hired with low I Q. I actually saw on one of those talkshows like Johnny Carson, or the newer ones with this guy applied to be a cop, and they would not hire him because his IQ was too high!
Alot of felonies and capital felonies these aggravated kidnapping traitors with badges committed…..
NO OBLIGATION to identify unless lawfully arrested, Brown v Texas, 4th and 5th and state law.
AND IF LAWFULLY ARRESTED, the RIGHT to REMAIN SILENT INVOKES…..
NO OBLIGATION to answer questions per:
Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (1949), was a United States Supreme Court case in which Justice Robert Jackson famously opined, "To bring in a lawyer means a real peril to solution of the crime because, under our adversary system, he deems that his sole duty is to protect his client—guilty or innocent—and that, in such a capacity, he owes no duty whatever to help society solve its crime problem. Under this conception of criminal procedure, any lawyer worth his salt will tell the suspect in no uncertain terms to make no statement to police under any circumstances."
In this case, a defendant was subjected to rigorous interrogation methods, including being forced to sleep on the floor, resulting in a confession to having committed murder. The Supreme Court ruled that the confession was involuntary and reversed his conviction.
Terry v Ohio 392 U.S. 1 "Of course, the person stopped is not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest, although it may alert the officer to the need for continued observation."
“The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that refusal to answer law enforcement questions cannot form the basis of reasonable suspicion. See Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 437, 111 S. Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991) ("We have consistently held that a refusal to cooperate, without more, does not furnish the minimal level of objective justification needed for a detention or seizure.") – U.S. v. Santos 403 F.3d 1120 (2005).
Hey Sue these white cops in federal court for violating this m a ns Civil and constitutional rights and falsifying their police reports. He did not have to give his name or any ID. These cops just wanted to lock up a black person. It's their pride and joy to hender a black person . They gets a nut out of harassing a black.man.
Short term memory loss! Dealing with morons! After the lawsuit, the fools just may be able to remember Jason. All the cops had da du is leave a guy alone!
There out there mind. Weed wasn't on his property.. No name needed. Pursue real crimnals…
All he had to do cause he owns these 2 properties . Now he owns you.
Because he owns these two pieces of property and??? Did anybody catch that?
Just another one of the million reasons why the police can’t be trusted..SMDH for isshh like this
Bro got arrested for not saying his name when he literally already said it
Heard the legend of jason apperently that officer is still yelling his name 40times per minute and has been put on unpaid leave
Arrested on my porch
Owns these 2 properties …. But you dont know who he is ???? Gtfo
All you have to do now is give them restraining orders to prevent FURTHER retribution while you pursue their police certifications and surety bond.. be safe and end careers
Dont have to unless you have been arrested
I'm sorry. I just can't watch it anymore. I do support your channel and I'll subscribe. Keep up the good work.
I love learning how stupid cops are. It feels amazing.
This is soo sad.
All you had to do was not violate the man's rights.
Cops are hired with low I Q. I actually saw on one of those talkshows like Johnny Carson, or the newer ones with this guy applied to be a cop, and they would not hire him because his IQ was too high!
Gotta comment to make it 223/.233/5.56. Sadly it changes from 222, old Canada OTC.
They got fired
I swear this sounds just like an episode of Reno 911
Nazis suck
Whatever you do, don’t accidentally leave this video on repeat. It will drive you crazy.
SSSOOOOO there was a deputy that brought his parrot to work? Was it 'bring your bird to work' day? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Your a black man in America..in there eyes(Police) your guilty..once you show them your not stupid and know your rights..they will violate you
settlement of 250,000
All he had to do is give up his rights.
Not freely turning over private information ie name ,dob ,ect is not a statute nor criminal offense.
Where's the part where he gave his DOB? Noticeably missing from the video.
Alot of felonies and capital felonies these aggravated kidnapping traitors with badges committed…..
NO OBLIGATION to identify unless lawfully arrested, Brown v Texas, 4th and 5th and state law.
AND IF LAWFULLY ARRESTED, the RIGHT to REMAIN SILENT INVOKES…..
NO OBLIGATION to answer questions per:
Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (1949), was a United States Supreme Court case in which Justice Robert Jackson famously opined, "To bring in a lawyer means a real peril to solution of the crime because, under our adversary system, he deems that his sole duty is to protect his client—guilty or innocent—and that, in such a capacity, he owes no duty whatever to help society solve its crime problem. Under this conception of criminal procedure, any lawyer worth his salt will tell the suspect in no uncertain terms to make no statement to police under any circumstances."
In this case, a defendant was subjected to rigorous interrogation methods, including being forced to sleep on the floor, resulting in a confession to having committed murder. The Supreme Court ruled that the confession was involuntary and reversed his conviction.
Terry v Ohio 392 U.S. 1
"Of course, the person stopped is not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest, although it may alert the officer to the need for continued observation."
“The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that refusal to answer law enforcement questions cannot form the basis of reasonable suspicion. See Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 437, 111 S. Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991) ("We have consistently held that a refusal to cooperate, without more, does not furnish the minimal level of objective justification needed for a detention or seizure.") – U.S. v. Santos 403 F.3d 1120 (2005).
Hey Sue these white cops in federal court for violating this m a ns Civil and constitutional rights and falsifying their police reports. He did not have to give his name or any ID. These cops just wanted to lock up a black person. It's their pride and joy to hender a black person . They gets a nut out of harassing a black.man.
Earn the hate
You dont have to do anything
Just bend over for the Klansmen in costume violating you and your rights.
Nice pay day for Jason right there 🤙🏼
Another lawsuit. Man held it well, against these tyrant pigs
They just harassing this man knowing he owns the property how dumb are they
Arrested for not licking their boots. The police found 3 pot plants 3 properties away from his.
Short term memory loss!
Dealing with morons!
After the lawsuit, the fools just may be able to remember Jason.
All the cops had da du is leave a guy alone!
All you had to do is give up your American rights like a good American! How hard is that?!
and if he had they would just find another reason