Conviction THROWN OUT! – Next Is The Lawsuit

29 Comments / By /



You usually only hear about “double jeopardy” in movies, but it’s the exact reason this criminal case is over, and Hugh Janis is a free man.

_*-Tillamook County Sheriff’s Office-*_
https://www.facebook.com/tillamookcountysheriff/
Deputy Travis Patterson

Chief Deputy District Attorney
Jeremy S. Dietrich

Part 1:

Part 2:

Help Hugh Fight The Upcoming Lawsuit!
http://spot.fund/j878rtcsc

*_Use code “Lack” for 10% off Attorney Shield!_*
https://attorney-shield.com/discount/LACK

*- Submit your video -*
https://forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6

– – _MERCH_ – – https://lacklustervideo.com/
Best Dash Cam – https://amzn.to/45fVYsW
Radar/Laser Detector- https://amzn.to/3P10Wnt
_I receive commissions from featured links on verified Amazon purchases, at no cost to you._

– – _Other Channels_ – –
_The Odd Side:_ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw
_LackLuster Clips:_ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w

– – _Social_ – –
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lacklustermedia.official
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DaleHillerYT
DISCORD: https://discord.gg/SUcPuym
IG: https://www.instagram.com/lackluster_media/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lackluster_official
Project1983.org

Law Enforcement Agencies and Public Officials *cannot* block specific users or unfavorable criticism on their public social media pages if the comment section is open for public comments.

*FAIR USE NOTICE:* This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

*Disclaimer:* Our videos and other published media should not be construed as legal advice. We are not attorneys, but more importantly, _we are not your attorney._ *Seek legal counsel if you believe you are a victim of police misconduct.* Facts presented in publications are not indicative of personal opinions. are designed to be educational and informative, based on the information available at the time. Laws, case law, ordinances, policies, legal doctrine, and all other jurisprudence is subject to the interpretation of the court. We in no way intended to provoke, incite or shock the viewer and should never be considered a ‘call to action’.

Submitting a video either digitally or through physical devices is not a guarantee that your video will be published. Furthermore, devices and documents that are sent to our PO Box will not be returned unless a self addressed, postage prepaid, return envelope is included with your package.

All claims made are alleged. If you see a mistake or misrepresentation, email us to remedy the issue immediately.

LackLuster Media LLC
PO Box 514
Chester, WV 26034
Lack@LackLusterVideo.com

#LackLuster #Cops #Police

source

29 thoughts on “Conviction THROWN OUT! – Next Is The Lawsuit”

  5. @robspears734

    Change doesn't happen watching videos..and do nothing,learn your rights and teach them to family and friends. As I do . There is a positive change thanks to this channel and many others. Education is key. Know your rights. Learn and apply them when tryanny is trying to throw you in a cage for virtually nothing.

  12. @ObjectivelyOutrageous

    Another oath-breaking officer somehow thinks free press means interference. He must think the founders made a mistake when they write the first amendment?! He also must have thought his sworn oath was only part of his costume? Imagine if all camera operators and reporters were arrested for interference? We'd have only state-run media! No one wants that, right, Deputy? Can we get reimbursed since we thought our hard-earned tax dollars were being allocated to oath-compliant, law-knowledgeable deputies?

  15. @tudorjason

    I think this is the 1st case I know about in which potential jurors had seen an auditing vid about the case they maybe serving.
    Because a judge and attorneys may want an "untainted" jury, prior knowledge may be a bad thing.
    However, these vids still serve a major benefit to the public.

  26. @DJYC21215

    I want to point out something: State Police are not above Deputies. Quite the opposite, since a Sheriff and his Deputies have both Civil and Criminal jurisdiction given the Sheriff is an Elected position. The Deputy could have disobeyed the State Trooper, since "Unarresting" someone is usually against Policy, and the State Trooper could have (Legally) done nothing about it.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top