*_Use code “Lack” for 10% off Attorney Shield!_*
https://attorney-shield.com/discount/LACK
*- Submit your video -*
https://forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6
– – _MERCH_ – – https://lacklustervideo.com/
Best Dash Cam – https://amzn.to/45fVYsW
Radar/Laser Detector- https://amzn.to/3P10Wnt
_I receive commissions from featured links on verified Amazon purchases, at no cost to you._
– – _Other Channels_ – –
_The Odd Side:_ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw
_LackLuster Clips:_ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w
– – _Social_ – –
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lacklustermedia.official
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DaleHillerYT
DISCORD: https://discord.gg/SUcPuym
IG: https://www.instagram.com/lackluster_media/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lackluster_official
Project1983.org
Law Enforcement Agencies and Public Officials *cannot* block specific users or unfavorable criticism on their public social media pages if the comment section is open for public comments.
*FAIR USE NOTICE:* This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
*Disclaimer:* Our videos and other published media should not be construed as legal advice. We are not attorneys, but more importantly, _we are not your attorney._ *Seek legal counsel if you believe you are a victim of police misconduct.* Facts presented in publications are not indicative of personal opinions. are designed to be educational and informative, based on the information available at the time. Laws, case law, ordinances, policies, legal doctrine, and all other jurisprudence is subject to the interpretation of the court. We in no way intended to provoke, incite or shock the viewer and should never be considered a ‘call to action’.
Submitting a video either digitally or through physical devices is not a guarantee that your video will be published. Furthermore, devices and documents that are sent to our PO Box will not be returned unless a self addressed, postage prepaid, return envelope is included with your package.
All claims made are alleged. If you see a mistake or misrepresentation, email us to remedy the issue immediately.
LackLuster Media LLC
PO Box 514
Chester, WV 26034
Lack@LackLusterVideo.com
#LackLuster #Cops #Police
source
Nobody would hire these clowns,must look at the bottom first!
Can someone make a rap or something about Pennsylvania v Mims!?!? Come on
Tampering with evidence.
Wow, a dodgy cop deleting a video. I’m shocked. 😂
LEOs are like a never ending joke that aren't just not funny, they're terrorizing.
BS 👍
PA v Mimms requires that they can reasonably articulate that they thought you were armed and presented an imminent threat. It's not a license for cops to pull you out of your car "because I said so"
So they're accusing you of smoking a joint between your job and The body shop wow and if you were a shame on you but if you weren't shame on them course they are paid the live cheat and steal that's the whole purpose of existing I'm talking about cops
The sad part is they can actually ask you to get out of the car , don’t fight with them , just get out of the car. There’s no sense in it. You’re gonna lose. They’re already on a power trip.
everyone is wrong here though. Cops treatment is wrong and shady, but the guy should've just gotten out of the car and not argued. Arguing just gives them more ammo for violating rights.
They’re hostile because they don’t like you, because you are the public and they want nothing more than to abuse you, charge you, lock you up and screw your life all up. Why? because you tried to hold them accountable to their actions and was recording them. Cops are dangerous, they’ll lie and go as far as unaliving you to get there way. They’re disgusting human being, if you can call them that
Refusing orders is not a crime…..not everything cops say is lawful, just because cops say its a " lawful order " does NOT mean it's legal or valid…
Simply dismissing the charges against the motorist is incomplete justice. The officer needs to stand before a judge as well. Just because the officer’s employment was terminated doesn’t relieve him of responsibility. 😮
Why don’t judges issue bench warrants when law enforcement officers don’t show up to court.
Violated his right to film, and then tried to delete the evidence. Yet that’s fine according to department policy??
yup.
💙Your videos and you😎 are Awesome!!!
×/'-🦋
Penn V. Mimms only allows police to remove you from your vehicle if the officer has credible reasons to believe officer safety may be threatened.
The reasoning behind Penn v Mimms is completely lost. It's all about creative writing on the incident report.
It's Wild that Law Enforcement Officers don't do their job with class and respect instead they assert asshole authority and disrespect like they are trained to do.* What would happen if many of us tax-paying citizens started to fund our Military Vets to Police the Police 🚔 🤔? Not like the I.A. who seem to be scared 😱 😨 to do their job to Police the Police. In fear of Lawsuits and settlements that we taxpayers have to pay anyway 😳.
I'm so sick of these demons
I thought that was considered “tampering with evidence”?
PA vs Mimms allows officers to remove an occupant from a vehicle when they can cite officer safety concerns, and not just because they want to.
Terrible asshole people! Sad they are police! People with this "it's us vs them" mentality needs to be weeded out of departments! Not only are they shitty cops, but shitty people!
The following should be mandatory minimum standards for becoming any form of law enforcement. (REVISED & UPDATED)
1) Mandatory 3rd party psychological evaluation
2) No criminal history.
3) Mandatory 1 yr constitutional law, civil rights, and de-escalation education/training.
4) Mandatory annual continued constitutional law,
civil rights and de-escalation education/training.
5) Mandatory national registry. (same as child offenders).
6) Prior citizen complaints follow for life.
7) Prior reprimands follow for life.
8) Limited qualified immunity with mandatory liability insurance.
9) Mandatory body cameras and mandatory termination, prosecution, and/or jail time for muting, tampering, obstructing, or deleting body camera footage. (Remove mute buttons altogether)
10) Mandatory full accountability and enforcement for breaching laws/ malfeasance. (such as threatening nonviolent civilians, filing a false report, and /or lying on a report/in court). THEY HAVE BODY CAMS TO REWATCH WHAT THEY DID… NO REASON TO ACCEPT LIES OR MANIPULATION.
Send this to your congressman.
COPY, PASTE, AND SHARE…
What is the difference between what we are witnessing here and what happened in Europe in the 1930s and during WW2 by the Nazis.
Why don't you trust the police?
If he had nothing to hide, why move the camera or delete evidence?
So the court here does care about destruction of evidence if this cop was only fired
Taxation is extortion
Corrupt cops caught on evidence without arrest warrants is crazy
Again.
In many cases, police are not legally required to tell you why they pulled you over before asking for ID.
If a police officer tries to delete a video you have of them on your phone, it is considered a serious violation of your rights and could constitute a crime; they have no legal authority to access or delete your personal recordings without a warrant, and doing so would likely result in legal repercussions for the officer, including potential charges for evidence tampering or obstruction of justice.
That happened me here in North Carolina.
Lowlife thug. They knew they were wrong so they tried to cover it up.
Police can order you to exit your vehicle during a traffic stop, even if they don't have a reason. This is because the officer's safety is a legitimate interest that outweighs your right to personal security, according to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Explanation
The Supreme Court ruled in Pennsylvania v. Mimms (1977) that police can order drivers out of their vehicles during a traffic stop.
The court ruled that this action is reasonable and doesn't violate the Fourth Amendment.
The court also ruled that officers don't need additional probable cause or reasonable suspicion to order drivers out of their vehicles.
This authority was expanded in Maryland v. Wilson (1997) to include passengers.
What to do if ordered to exit
If you're ordered to exit your vehicle during a traffic stop, you should remain calm and comply with the officer's requests. If you believe your rights were violated, you can contact an attorney.
Atkinson looks like a psycho
WE THE PEOPLE
They stick their hand inside the vehicle without probable cause and unlock the door.
That was a SMOOOOTH move from Occipher Unemployed. Silly badge wearer, tricks are for cucks.
Fired?!?! Why the hell was he fired? He destroyed evidence in a criminal investigation!!! He needed to be charged!! Why the hell would we celebrate a firing!! Maybe we could celebrate the DA getting fired for not charging him!!
Fired? Should be blacklisted from being a cop again. They were hostile to the dude from the beginning over a minor traffic stop.
How is that Mayor in that role when he has no understanding of the Constitution? Fire the Mayor immediately as he is unfit for the role.
Caulk one up for "We the People".
He's blessed to be alive.🍃🙏🏾🍃
That was an extremely uncomfortable situation…
… But… they cited a SCOTUS case..??
Showing the corruption is absolutely necessary!
Law suit