Under Terry they can frisk for weapons if there is some actual reason to believe that the person is armed and dangerous. "I'm scared to talk to people" is NOT a reasonable excuse. If there was just a shooting and the person is running away in street clothes and happens to match the description of a person involved, then that is reasonable to frisk under Terry. Its really not a difficult thing, idk why police academies seem to fuck this one up so consistantly
Is that all those tyrants are worried about is officer safety what about the unarmed guy being approached by a cop who has a belt full of torture implements why ar t they concerned about his safety I mean isn’t that what the taxpayers pay them to do protect and serve
A cop does NOT have the right to search someone for weapons for police "safety", when they have NOT stopped the person for a FIRST REASON. Police safety deals with safety AFTER a stop, and there is no such thing as looking at someone walking or standing and claiming they have the right to search them. That's NAZI Germany tactics & NOT LAW.
"I feel so unsafe by your presence, I'm going to walk up on you to within 2 ft in a relaxed posture with no defensive weapons at the ready."
Even if this pork bag was telling the truth, this would be the most re[dact]ed way to approach a suspect. If anything, Ole Boy should have had Mr. 1A Audit raise his shirt to display his waistband and chest to see no weapons were visible there. It's still a 'search' imo (and a 4th violation, absent a RAS of criminal activity) but at least it would pass mustard as an "oFfIcEr SaFeTy" tactic.
STOPING YOU FOR NOTHING IS BULL SHIT AND CHECK YOU FOR WEAPONS THE MAN DID NOTHING THERE NOT EXCUSED FOR BEING THUGS WELL ILL THINK OF WHAT I CAN SURCH YOU FOR HE JUST WANTED TO TOUCH YOU UP HES A PERVERT
He most certainly does, you approaches him, he has absolutely no clue what ur intentions are whether ill or not, plus there are a few jump cuts here so again dont know the whole story, but that is what you brain washed ppl are trained to beleive…
Having a weapon isn’t illegal and is your constitutional right in America. No searches or seizures of property, any other questions before I’m free to go on my way? If not, what’s your reasonable articulable suspicion to detain me? None? Ok, good day. You’re arresting me anyway for obstruction? Thanks for the millions of dollars 💰
So cops can go around town search everyone and take their weapons for safety? Guess thats one way to make sure only cops have weapons gotta love america
If this guy didn't have a weapon on him why did he bother? Wouldn't it be smart to start recording agree on patdown and then with some evidence go to the court? Why make a scene? I was under the impression americans favourite past time is courtroom bullshit
I've had police interactions before and they don't ask about weapons unless they put me in their car
Under Terry they can frisk for weapons if there is some actual reason to believe that the person is armed and dangerous. "I'm scared to talk to people" is NOT a reasonable excuse. If there was just a shooting and the person is running away in street clothes and happens to match the description of a person involved, then that is reasonable to frisk under Terry. Its really not a difficult thing, idk why police academies seem to fuck this one up so consistantly
“Officer safety” A great example of gaslighting. It’s not about officer safety but control.
notice 2 thins on the tyrants tattoos arms and or skin head
Is that all those tyrants are worried about is officer safety what about the unarmed guy being approached by a cop who has a belt full of torture implements why ar t they concerned about his safety I mean isn’t that what the taxpayers pay them to do protect and serve
Power tripping revenue generators.
That cop is a narcissist.
Why dont officers under Terry V Ohio. You can only do a "Terry Firsk" if you suspect someone to be armed not just for "officer safety"
Wow praising guys who say they have the right to search you….this is disgraceful auditing
the supervisor flat out lied to you.
Thugs in uniform.
Looks like a Need for Speed cutscene.
A cop does NOT have the right to search someone for weapons for police "safety", when they have NOT stopped the person for a FIRST REASON. Police safety deals with safety AFTER a stop, and there is no such thing as looking at someone walking or standing and claiming they have the right to search them. That's NAZI Germany tactics & NOT LAW.
“See ya guys”
Dorks. 😂
Issue 2 donut hole real quick
The auditor backed down and kissed the butt of the officer that threatened to search him. What a tool.
Plus, the cops have no idea what they're talking about. That can't just drive around the city and start searching people at random.
Why is this guy just out filming to create problems?
Don’t be a cop if you feel the need to search someone right away. If you’re sooooo scared, ask for a desk job pushing papers.
the officers has things to hurt us
"I feel so unsafe by your presence, I'm going to walk up on you to within 2 ft in a relaxed posture with no defensive weapons at the ready."
Even if this pork bag was telling the truth, this would be the most re[dact]ed way to approach a suspect. If anything, Ole Boy should have had Mr. 1A Audit raise his shirt to display his waistband and chest to see no weapons were visible there. It's still a 'search' imo (and a 4th violation, absent a RAS of criminal activity) but at least it would pass mustard as an "oFfIcEr SaFeTy" tactic.
STOPING YOU FOR NOTHING IS BULL SHIT AND CHECK YOU FOR WEAPONS THE MAN DID NOTHING THERE NOT EXCUSED FOR BEING THUGS WELL ILL THINK OF WHAT I CAN SURCH YOU FOR HE JUST WANTED TO TOUCH YOU UP HES A PERVERT
they all use that b.s."it's for our safety".if any thing,their the biggest threat.their not,friend's.never get caught,off guard.
FUK their officer safety. Their safety doesn't trump my rights.
Male Karen was in the right
Your safety is going to become a real issue, if you continue to abuse your assumed power. The people will turn, and a price will be paid.
What about the weapons you have to hurt me cop.
We need to start treating TSA officers the same way.
Those are security guards, not cops. That kid needs to go back the mall where he belongs.
That supervisors eyes look spooky.
He most certainly does, you approaches him, he has absolutely no clue what ur intentions are whether ill or not, plus there are a few jump cuts here so again dont know the whole story, but that is what you brain washed ppl are trained to beleive…
they both had some crazy eyes, they need to do pee tests…
Welcome to Nazi 🇩🇪 Germany
Are you detaining me?
No.
Goodbye.
Reasonable and Articulable Suspicion of a CRIME.
Without that any detention, search or arrest is Unlawful and Unconstitutional.
Illegal searches and seizures. The 4th amendment is pretty clear. I don't give a shit what their interpretation is.
Officer safety is not a statute .
It’s not illegal to carry a weapon in the US. He’d had a better chance if he at the least said he was searching him for something illegal
Video jerks
Blocked channel.
Why is he taking a video?
Does this guy video kids on playground?
Block channel
.
Having a weapon isn’t illegal and is your constitutional right in America. No searches or seizures of property, any other questions before I’m free to go on my way? If not, what’s your reasonable articulable suspicion to detain me? None? Ok, good day. You’re arresting me anyway for obstruction? Thanks for the millions of dollars 💰
So cops can go around town search everyone and take their weapons for safety? Guess thats one way to make sure only cops have weapons gotta love america
the trainer of academy's one of the culprits why bad cops exist
Alright goodnight u know they can't do shit
If this guy didn't have a weapon on him why did he bother? Wouldn't it be smart to start recording agree on patdown and then with some evidence go to the court? Why make a scene? I was under the impression americans favourite past time is courtroom bullshit