Pennsylvania versus Mims is intended for Officer safety. Based on Terry v Ohio. 



Link to the New Merch Store is :https://my-store-d9ec76.creator-spring.com

Get your “We Don’t Stop” T-shirt and your Indestructible Tri-Fold on DeletelawZ dot com — We Dont Stop —

THE TRANSPARENCY APP IS COMING VERY SOON!!

You should always use THE TRIFOLD That we sell on INDESTRUCTIBLE PAPER from the website DeleteLawZ dot com for $25.00. We ship it from Los Angeles. OR — get the Trifold you PRINT AT HOME for five dollars

DeleteLawZ dot com

Thanks,
Chille
@ChilleDeCastro PayPal
@Chille-DeCastro Venmo
$ChilleDeCastro Cashapp

Link To DLZ CLIPS RELOADED:
https://YouTube.com/@UCU0_WIt-BBxznrF7BuoBJ3w

Amazon Wishlist: https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/2OZO37IQE83BT/ref=nav_wishlist_lists_2

source

20 thoughts on “Pennsylvania versus Mims is intended for Officer safety. Based on Terry v Ohio. ”

  1. Mimms is constitutional, it was upheld by the US Supreme Court which, literally, I'll say it again, LITERALLY makes it constitutional. You may disapprove, or disagree, but in this, your opinion means nothing, just like Chille's Law Degree from Ida Knownt U. Little info for all you legal beagal experts.

  2. Terry stops… Unconstitutional and violation of the right to travel freely without restrictions.
    Pennsylvania vs Mimms… Unconstitutional and violates your right to be secure in your person, papers and effects ie supreme court ruled that your vehicle is part of the effects clause and requires a warrant to clear it just as your home.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top