38 thoughts on “Who Decides what Suspicious is?”

  1. “We got a call that you were looking into cars”

    “There’s been a lot of break-ins in the area”

    “ You match the description of somebody who did X, Y or Z“

    “We got a call about you; several calls! I’m going to need to see some ID“.

    “Do you have some identification on you, some people are calling about you“

  2. The people who join the police force are the same people that wash out out of the military and can't cut it for govt work and if they can't be cops then they end up being "private security" they are still just kids trying to be accepted that's all and when they don't get accepted they abuse what little power they get

  3. It's all education and skin color, I was in Minnesota early 2011, I get pulled over high as a kite with a black guy and native chick in back seat. I'm white ex 11B. We had an 8th of weed in back seat. Cop says it's suspicious that I'm driving at 1am in a bad neighborhood. Mind you I don't have a valid license either. Cops search car with dog and run my name. Sargent asks cop that stopped us why he stopped us, he said it was suspicious. Sargent told me to beat up the guy in back for having drugs on him after I get back to where I came from and let us go. If I was any other color or didn't have the education I would have been locked up for that.

  4. The people who decide to be cops are desperately trying to control everyone else's lives and think that they are superior to everyone else and that the demonic badge gives these cops the right to be suspicious of non–cop actions.

  5. This is a high-crime neighborhood therefore anyone in the neighborhood is Under Suspicion .. even if you just couldn't figure out another way to get across town….. There you go there's my articulable😂🤣😅😆

  6. I have (2) two friends that are now cops but they failed for years to be cops because they couldn't stop smoking weed then once they were cops tried to arrest thir dealers 😂😂😂😂 then (1) one of them came back years later and ask him after he knew that no matter what he did he couldn't get fire and asked him…to sell him weed. 😂😂😂😂 as he would sell him anything, you tried to fuck him over…by the way both of the officers are fat as fuck. Lol

  7. This might be an unpopular opinion but I'm going to go ahead and give it a lot of people especially the media try to push this narrative that cops are racist just at me other has nothing to do with race and has everything to do with them against us in their ego police officers have a ego problem not a race problem once you hurt that ego or challenge that Authority the dick head comes out they cannot put your ego to the side and police fairly or effectively I've seen police officers do things to American citizens that if soldiers did in another country while we were doing police operation they would get court-martialed at the very least

  8. Hmmm….? Just the term "signing up" has me pondering and questioning yet once again as your #1 commentating troll, whether you are a board registered or bar certified Constitutional Law Professor. Also makes me ponder the thought if you even passed the bar law exam to be certified as such. My statement would be… NO!
    You are nothing but a You Tube "teacher" and You Tube is your classroom. How would I know this?
    During your lawsuit against Josh and Kate? Within the entirety of the zoom trial titled Chilli's Epic Court Loss you did not mention once to the Judge that you are a Constitutional Law Scholar, did you? You knew that the Judge would have called you out immediately if you made such a claim.
    Where as I am discussing claims within the zoom trial which are now public knowledge? Both Josh and Kate exposed you as a woman beater, with Josh having in his possession video evidence of you aggressively and physically assaulting Kate twice at the same event, within minutes of the first assault which Kate's testimony backed up Josh's, to which you did not even defend or forward an argument against. Did you? Yet their testimonies were entered as evidence against you based on the merits of your claim. Were they not? Yes indeed they were. You lost that lawsuit on such an embarrassing level, that you made yourself a laughing stalk of a fool!
    My favourite part of the zoom trial was when the Judge muted your mike on numerous occasions due to you trying to over talk everyone else including the Judge. And when you had the opportunity to talk? You could not even give a completed coherent one sentence answer without stepping outside of the question asked of you countless times over.
    You are nothing but a wanna be C.L.S.!
    By assaulting Kate as you did? You trampled over her freedoms of the right of free speech/opinion, her rights to freedom of the press and her rights to freely assemble/movement.
    You are a zoom court trial proven woman beating cowardly hypocrite and nothing else.
    And even though Kate has not charged you with assault. The word YET comes to mind!
    And to be honest with you. I am using your own words against you. You make it too damn easy.

  9. "This is a high crime neighborhood.."

    Possible responses..
    – "Ohh so a bunch of cops live here then..?"
    – "Congratulations!"
    – "Oh sh!t, good thing this is America. Otherwise, I would be guilty until proven innocent. Right? America? So, innocent until proven guilty. As you have not produced any proof that I'm guilty, you can go fk off. Mmkay? Thanks pumpkin…"

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top