FBI SWAT Raided the Wrong House, Terrorized Innocent Family (but on Tuesday they get justice)



Use code civil at https://incogni.com/civil to get an exclusive 60% off an Incogni plan.

DONATE to the Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/support/give-now/thecivilrightslawyer/

In 2017, Trina Martin and her son Gabe were living at the home of her then-boyfriend Toi Cliatt. Early in the morning, an FBI SWAT team battered down their door, detonated a flash-bang grenade, and swept through the home with assault rifles. Toi rushed Trina to a closet while Gabe was alone in his bedroom. When agents discovered Toi and Trina, they handcuffed Toi and started to interrogate him. It was only when Toi stated his address that the agents realized they were in the wrong place. The SWAT team left the home and went to the address of the house they had a warrant for. The lead agent later returned and left a card for Toi to reach out to about compensation. But the federal government refused to compensate them for anything, even though the raid led to lost wages and therapy bills. The three sued the FBI but their case was dismissed first by a federal district court and then the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

More about Martin v. United States: https://ij.org/case/martin-v-united-states/listeners-guide-to-martin-v-us/

Video to submit? https://forms.gle/HmwnDQKvwvYPxe967
MERCH: https://tcrl.creator-spring.com
For business inquiries: civilrightslawyer@ellify.com
Blog: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/johnbryanesq
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JohnBryanLaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/johnbryanesq/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer

#lawenforcement #bodycam #lawyer #police #law #legaleducation

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

NOTE: We don’t condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system.

NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.

source

31 thoughts on “FBI SWAT Raided the Wrong House, Terrorized Innocent Family (but on Tuesday they get justice)”

  1. I think this case proves two irrevocable facts. One, we the "citizens" of the "United States" do in fact live in a Police State where we no longer have rights. Two, the level of willful ignorance exhibited by Federal, State, and Local Officials calls into question both the legitimacy of the seemingly carte blanche authority granted to Officials as well as the Militaristic (Citizens are the enemy) style of training received by these "Federal, State, and Local Officials"

  2. It could be in Taj Mahalo. Still no fking excuse for these stupid no knocks especially ESPECIALLY when it's the wrong dang address…..
    If they HADN'T figured it out until days later you KNOW they'd be arguing everything seized of value was already sent to DOJ, so sorry…..give it a break finally perhaps cameras are slowly turning the tide. πŸ€žπŸ€žπŸ€žπŸ™πŸ™πŸ™

  3. Thats a pretty big fawk up for the feds. Usually they are perceived to have their shit together. I expect this from the local jokers but not a bureau with a 95 percent conviction rateπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ sure it sounds impressive but when you realize 94 percent of those are plea deals, its really not that impressive.

  4. Criminals are criminals, and if they wear badges, they are the worst criminals. Those who protect these criminals are the worst of the worst. If that case is lost, it means every citizen rights are gone and any officer can do crimes without any consequences. That's how you turn rest of those "good cops" to criminals too.

  5. When you have an organisation that is not subject to the very same laws it is apparently trying to uphold… you by definition have a criminal organisation in my humble opinion.

  6. It is said that during the rise of Nazis in Germany and the genocide of the Jews, that if the jews had met the brown shirts with pistols, 6,000,000 Jews wouldn't have been sent to concentration camps and marched into gas chambers and ovens.

  7. I agree what you say and what you are trying to accomplished but no one is going to take you serious if you look like Osama Bin Laden. Please shave your face and at least try to look a little like a lawyer?

  8. They knew that that house was a black family and they knew that they have weapons hoping that they would draw them and it would have been a mistake but a mistake that would have cost them their lives it's happened to many times in my own neighborhoods seeing it done find out what house they was actually supposed to go to and if they actually act it out that whole investigation or rad

  9. this is done on purpose… to get everyone used to it…. poor…. rich…..everyone…. the more they do it…. the more everyone will accept it….all part of the plan…..

Leave a Reply to @lapasorsa9022 Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top